Mr John Hare

Former MP for Sudbury and Woodbridge

🗣️ Speeches and Debates

  • Orders of the Day — Clause 4. — (Written Particulars of Terms of Employment.) 26 Jul 1963

    I will be very pleased to follow the suggestion of the hon. Member for East Ham, North (Mr. Prentice). That was my intention. We want to ensure that as much lay language as possible is used.
  • Orders of the Day — New Clause. — (Power to Vary Number of Weekly Hours of Employment Necessary to Qualify for Rights.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, "That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. The Bill at present applies only to employees who normally work for their employers 21 hours or more a week. In our earlier discussions, I said that that was so that the Bill should benefit those who depend on that employment for at least a substantial part of their livelihood, and and that inconsiderable and...
  • Orders of the Day — New Clause. — (Power to Vary Number of Weekly Hours of Employment Necessary to Qualify for Rights.) 26 Jul 1963

    With the leave of the House, I can tell the hon. Member for East Ham, North (Mr. Prentice) that this Amendment goes some way to please him, and provides the flexibility which he felt was lacking before. My hon. Friend the Member for Crosby (Mr. Graham Page) will appreciate that Schedule 1 already works retrospectively, because employment engaged in before the Bill comes into force will...
  • Orders of the Day — Schedule 2. — (Rights of Employee in Period of Notice.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. It would be convenient also to take the Lords Amendments: In line 8, after first "hours" insert: (in this paragraph referred to as 'the number of hours without overtime') and in line 8, at end insert: (2) If in such a case— (a) the contract of employment fixes the number, or the minimum number, of hours of...
  • Clause 1. — (Premises to Which This Act Applies.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. Perhaps it would be convenient if, with this Amendment, we discussed the subsequent Amendments in line 37, to leave out "and", and in line 40, at end insert: (d) 'dock storage premises' means fuel storage premises which constitute or are comprised in premises to which certain provisions of the Factories Act 1961...
  • Clause 5. — (Overcrowding.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. During the Committee stage there was considerable discussion on an Amendment moved by the hon. Member for Sheffield, Park (Mr. Mulley) which would have required inspectors to take into account space occupied by furniture, furnishings, fittings and machines in determining whether the standard of 40 sq. ft. per...
  • Clause 13. — (Sitting Facilities.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. The provision of seats in shops for shop assistants was debated at some length when I introduced a new Clause about sitting facilities on the Report stage. As the hon. Member for Ogmore (Mr. Padley) forecast, the Opposition returned to this subject in another place. It was argued that some employers might locate...
  • Clause 18. — (Avoidance of Exposure of Young Persons to Danger in Cleaning Machinery.) 26 Jul 1963

    I beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said Amendment. This Amendment anticipates the two following Amendments which delete the references to young persons in Clause 19. Since the term "young person" will then appear only in. Clause 18, it is desirable for drafting reasons to transfer the definition from Clause 88 to Clause 18. This Amendment therefore puts the...

More of Mr John Hare's speeches and debates

✍️ Written Questions and Answers

No recent written questions to display.