Security Sensitive Evidence in Courts
There have been votes in Parliament on if there should be a mechanism for material deemed national security sensitive to be made available to a civil court and a special advocate but not parties to the case. The mechanism is called the "closed material procedure".
Photo:
Alba Palacios
Phil Wilson generally voted against allowing national security sensitive evidence to be put before courts in secret sessions
To suggest amendments or new votes for inclusion, please use this feedback form.
TheyWorkForYou has calculated this MP’s stance based on votes we have grouped on this topic. Learn more.
You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk. We are in the process of moving away from using the PublicWhip and there may be some discrepancies between the two sites.
-
On 17 Jul 2013:
Phil Wilson voted against rules implementing the introduction of "closed material proceedings" to the civil courts in Northern Ireland; the procedure involves making material deemed national security-sensitive available to the court and a special advocate but not parties to the case.
Show vote
-
On 17 Jul 2013:
Phil Wilson voted against rules implementing the introduction of "closed material proceedings" to courts; the procedure involves making material deemed national security-sensitive available to the court and a special advocate but not parties to the case.
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2013:
Phil Wilson was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Third Reading
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Phil Wilson voted to permit closed material proceedings only if a fair determination of the case would not be possible by other means.
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Phil Wilson acted as teller for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Clause 8 — Balance National Security vs Public Interest in Requests to Withhold Information From Parties in Civil Court Cases
Show vote
-
On 18 Dec 2012:
Phil Wilson was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Second Reading
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Phil Wilson voted to only allow the closed material procedure for using national security sensitive information in court to to be used where the degree of harm to national security caused by disclosure would be likely to outweigh the public interest in fair and open justice.
Show vote