An Elected House of Lords
The House of Lords is the upper house of the UK Parliament. There have been votes on moving away from a position where members of the House of Lords are either appointed or have inherited their seats to a system where members are elected.
Photo:
UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor
Phil Woolas voted a mixture of for and against a wholly elected House of Lords
TheyWorkForYou has automatically calculated this MP’s stance based on all
of their votes on the topic. You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk.
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Support for bicameral Parliament
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 1 (Fully Appointed) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 4 (50 per Cent. Elected) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 5 (60 per Cent. Elected) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 6 (80 per Cent. Elected)
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2007:
Phil Woolas was absent for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 7 (100 per Cent. Elected)
Show vote
-
On 4 Feb 2003:
Phil Woolas acted as teller for a vote on House of Lords Reform — House of Lords to be abolished — rejected
Show vote
-
On 4 Feb 2003:
Phil Woolas acted as teller for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Option 1 (Fully Appointed) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 4 Feb 2003:
Phil Woolas acted as teller for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Option 2 (100 per Cent. Elected) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 4 Feb 2003:
Phil Woolas acted as teller for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Option 4 (80 per Cent. Elected) — rejected
Show vote
-
On 4 Feb 2003:
Phil Woolas acted as teller for a vote on House of Lords Reform — Option 6 (60 per Cent. Elected) — rejected
Show vote
