Mr Michael Trend

Former Conservative MP for Windsor

🗣️ Speeches and Debates

  • China 25 Mar 2004

    I, too, would like to thank the Minister for providing the opportunity for this important debate. I begin by quoting from a statement made two weeks ago: "China is undergoing a process of deep change. In order to effect this change smoothly and without chaos and violence I believe it is essential that there be more openness and greater freedom of information and proper awareness among the...
  • China 25 Mar 2004

    The Minister is going to detail the four priorities that he identified earlier. In the last five minutes, he mentioned human rights briefly, but can he tell me whether the Foreign Office thinks that human rights should be one of the priorities. If it does not think that they are sufficiently important, why not?
  • China 25 Mar 2004

    I have a factual question for the Minister. Has a date been set for the visit of the Chinese Premier to London? I do not know if he has already mentioned that, as I was dozing.
  • Public Bill Committee: Civil Contingencies Bill: New clause 3 - Compensation 10 Feb 2004

    The Minister said ''often''. Can he give the Committee an idea of the circumstance, real or imaginary, in which compensation would not be paid?
  • Public Bill Committee: Civil Contingencies Bill: Clause 21 - Scope of emergency regulations 5 Feb 2004

    What the Under-Secretary has been saying presupposes that the courts will be able to sit. Could they be deemed to be an assembly that cannot sit?
  • Public Bill Committee: Civil Contingencies Bill: Clause 21 - Scope of emergency regulations 5 Feb 2004

    May I make a suggestion? There is a blanket prohibition on assemblies of ''specified kinds'', but the problem would be solved if Parliament were deliberately exempted from being a specified kind of assembly.
  • Public Bill Committee: Civil Contingencies Bill: Clause 21 - Scope of emergency regulations 5 Feb 2004

    I support what the hon. Gentleman and my hon. Friend the Member for Newark said about the amendment. I do not think that the provision is merely otiose: it is potentially pernicious. We have got into a pattern in recent debates of Opposition Members saying that the wording is not precise enough or too vague. They want to know precisely what is meant and think that it is unwise to have a...
  • Public Bill Committee: Civil Contingencies Bill: Clause 21 - Scope of emergency regulations 5 Feb 2004

    It is a small point, but my hon. Friend should give credit to the Public Administration Committee, on which I have the honour of sitting, for producing a useful draft Bill.

More of Mr Michael Trend's speeches and debates

✍️ Written Questions and Answers

More of Mr Michael Trend's written questions