Tax Avoidance
Parliament has voted on measures, including the introduction of a general anti-abuse rule, aimed at tackling abusive tax avoidance.
Photo:
HM Treasury
Graham Brady generally voted for measures to reduce tax avoidance
TheyWorkForYou has automatically calculated this MP’s stance based on all
of their votes on the topic. You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk.
-
On 25 Feb 2020:
Graham Brady was absent for a vote on Proper Funding of Public Services — Tax Avoidance and Evasion
Show vote
-
On 12 Nov 2018:
Graham Brady was absent for a vote on Finance Bill — Decline Second Reading
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
-
On 12 Nov 2018:
Graham Brady was absent for a vote on Finance Bill — Second Reading
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
-
On 18 Apr 2017:
Graham Brady voted to raise the threshold for paying higher rate income tax, to introduce a Soft Drinks Industry Levy, to restrict the national insurance benefits of remuneration other than salary and for other changes to the tax system.
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
-
On 18 Apr 2017:
Graham Brady voted to raise the threshold for paying higher rate income tax, to introduce a Soft Drinks Industry Levy, to restrict the national insurance benefits of remuneration other than via salary and for other changes to the tax system.
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
-
On 28 Jun 2016:
Graham Brady was absent for a vote on Finance Bill — Schedule 19 — Multinational Enterprises — Publication of Country by Country Tax Strategy
Show vote
-
On 19 Apr 2016:
Graham Brady was absent for a vote on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill — Combating Abusive Tax Avoidance Arrangements
Show vote
-
On 13 Apr 2016:
Graham Brady voted against implementing a series of proposals intended to reduce tax avoidance and evasion.
Show vote
-
On 2 Jul 2013:
Graham Brady voted to introduce a general anti-abuse rule to tackle abusive tax avoidance, to raise the basic income tax free allowance, and to support other tax changes proposed in the Finance Bill.
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
-
On 15 Apr 2013:
Graham Brady voted to introduce a general anti-abuse rule to tackle abusive tax avoidance, to raise the basic income tax free allowance, and to support other tax changes proposed in the Finance Bill.
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
This policy conflicts with:
-
On 25 Mar 2013:
Graham Brady voted to set a budget for 2013-14 involving raising £612bn and spending £720bn; continuing to reduce corporation tax, introducing a scheme to help people buy homes worth up to £600,000 and to increase the personal income tax allowance for those of working age.
Show vote
This vote is also related to:
This policy conflicts with:
Agreements are when Parliament takes a decision without holding a vote.
This does not necessarily mean universal approval, but does mean there were no (or few) objections made to the decision being made.
No scoring agreements are part of this policy while this member was elected.
-
On 1 Jul 2020:
Graham Brady voted to delay shifting responsibility for determining if off-payroll working rules apply from an individual’s personal service company to their client (where the client isn't a small company).
Show vote
-
On 20 Jan 2020:
Graham Brady voted against requiring a plan to reverse the impact of austerity, tackle the climate and environmental emergency, and reshape the economy to work for everyone by clamping down on tax avoidance, tackling insecurity in work by extending full employment rights to all workers, ending in-work poverty, and introducing a real living wage.
Show vote
-
On 11 Feb 2015:
Graham Brady voted against introducing a penalty regime for the general anti-abuse rule and against other measures intended to reduce tax avoidance.
Show vote
-
On 1 Jul 2013:
Graham Brady voted against requiring a review of the potential for new internationally co-ordinated laws requiring greater transparency on how much tax multi-national companies pay to the UK and other countries.
Show vote
Agreements are when Parliament takes a decision without holding a vote.
This does not necessarily mean universal approval, but does mean there were no (or few) objections made to the decision being made.
No informative agreements are part of this policy while this member was elected.