Amendment 27

Football Governance Bill [HL] - Report (1st Day) (Continued) – in the House of Lords at 9:45 pm on 11 March 2025.

Alert me about debates like this

Votes in this debate

Lord Ranger of Northwood:

Moved by Lord Ranger of Northwood

27: Clause 14, page 8, line 37, at end insert—“(aa) a review of the impact of the activity of the IFR on ticket prices, and”

Photo of Lord Ranger of Northwood Lord Ranger of Northwood Conservative

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her consideration of my amendment earlier this evening. I note that she mentioned that the annual report was not the place for the information about the potential cost implications of the independent financial football regulator in terms of its impact on ticket prices. I respectfully disagree. I think that report would be exactly the place that any financial implications that come from the IFR and the impact that they would have on football fans should be.

I also note her letter about cost implications, which also identifies that up to two and a half full-time equivalents could be placed in larger clubs in terms of cost requirements for compliance, and up to 0.5 equivalents for smaller clubs. These are significant figures. They would have an impact on the costs for clubs across our country.

I also noted in the letter that the costs would be borne by those with the broadest shoulders—a term normally used for taxation. I feel that we must be careful about placing a further burden on the shoulders of English football fans. So, with respect, I would like to test the opinion of the House on my amendment.

Ayes 43, Noes 120.

Division number 5 Football Governance Bill [HL] - Report (1st Day) (Continued) — Amendment 27

Aye: 41 Members of the House of Lords

No: 118 Members of the House of Lords

Aye: A-Z by last name

Tellers

No: A-Z by last name

Tellers

Amendment 27 disagreed.

Clause 16: Application for provisional operating licence

Amendment 28 not moved.

Schedule 4: Threshold requirements

Amendment 29 not moved.