Amendment 110

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Report (2nd Day) – in the House of Lords at 7:00 pm on 27 June 2023.

Alert me about debates like this

Votes in this debate

Lord Garnier:

Moved by Lord Garnier

110: Clause 188, page 177, line 23, leave out “which is a large organisation”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment, together with the amendment to leave out Clause 190, would remove the exemption for organisations that are not “large organisations” from the failure to prevent regime so that there are no exemptions, although the statutory defence will apply to all organisations.

Photo of Lord Garnier Lord Garnier Conservative

My Lords, clearly, I have not persuaded the Government, but I hope that I have not treated their arguments with disrespect. We have had not a row but an honest disagreement. As with all sorts of disagreements, I invite the House to arbitrate and will press this amendment to a Division.

Photo of Baroness Barker Baroness Barker Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Voluntary Sector), Deputy Chairman of Committees

I advise the House that, if Amendment 110 is agreed to, I cannot call Amendment 111 because of pre-emption.

Ayes 179, Noes 176.

Division number 1 Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 110

Aye: 177 Members of the House of Lords

No: 174 Members of the House of Lords

Aye: A-Z by last name

Tellers

No: A-Z by last name

Tellers

Amendment 110 agreed.