Amendment 258B

Part of Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - Committee (10th Day) – in the House of Lords at 7:15 pm on 20 April 2023.

Alert me about debates like this

Lord Lansley:

Moved by Lord Lansley

258B: Clause 102, page 130, line 28, at end insert— “(5A) Where a subsequent planning permission (Permission B) is for localised changes to a wider development approved in the existing permission (Permission A), which would not have the effect of rendering the implementation of the Permission A physically impossible, the implementation of permission B does not preclude future reliance upon Permission A (in relation to existing or future development) outside of the area to which permission B relates.”Member's explanatory statementThis amendment would support the continuation of “drop-in” permissions in large-scale developments, while maintaining the “Pilkington” principle, that they must not render the original permission physically impossible.