A service from mySociety A service from mySociety

TheyWorkForYou

Menu

Amendment 4

Judicial Review and Courts Bill - Report – in the House of Lords at 2:28 pm on 31 March 2022.

Alert me about debates like this

Votes in this debate

Lord Etherton:

Moved by Lord Etherton

4: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 24 to 32Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the presumption that where a suspended or prospective-only quashing order would offer adequate redress, such a quashing order should be made in preference to an ordinary quashing order.

Photo of Lord Etherton Lord Etherton Crossbench

I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Ayes 159, Noes 134.

Division number 4 Judicial Review and Courts Bill - Report — Amendment 4

Aye: 159 Members of the House of Lords

No: 134 Members of the House of Lords

Aye: A-Z by last name

No: A-Z by last name

Amendment 4 agreed.

Clause 2: Exclusion of review of Upper Tribunal’s permission-to-appeal decisions