Amendments 93 and 94

United Kingdom Internal Market Bill - Committee (2nd Day) – in the House of Lords at 11:15 pm on 28th October 2020.

Alert me about debates like this

Lord Callanan:

Moved by Lord Callanan

93: Clause 20, page 14, line 16, at end insert—“(4A) For the purposes of subsections (1) to (4)—(a) an “incoming service provider” is a service provider that—(i) provides the services in the part of the United Kingdom in which the regulatory requirement applies, but(ii) does not have a relevant connection to that part;(b) a “local service provider” is a service provider that—(i) provides the services in the part of the United Kingdom in which the regulatory requirement applies,(ii) has a relevant connection to that part, and (iii) does not have a relevant connection to another part of the United Kingdom;(c) a service provider has a “relevant connection” to a part of the United Kingdom if the service provider—(i) has a registered office, place of business or residence in that part, or(ii) provides the services from that part.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would define concepts used in the other amendments to Clause 20 in my name.

94: Clause 20, page 14, line 17, leave out subsection (5)Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove an unnecessary interpretation provision.

Amendments 93 and 94 agreed.

Amendments 95 to 102 not moved.

Clause 20, as amended, agreed.

Clause 21 agreed.

Photo of Lord Alderdice Lord Alderdice Deputy Chairman of Committees

We now come to the group beginning with Amendment 102A. I remind noble Lords that anyone wishing to speak after the Minister should email the clerk during the debate, and anyone wishing to press this or anything else in the group to a Division should make that clear in debate.