Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL] - Report (1st Day) (Continued)

Part of the debate – in the House of Lords at 7:00 pm on 15 January 2018.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Elystan-Morgan Lord Elystan-Morgan Crossbench 7:00, 15 January 2018

My Lords, the arguments have been put clearly and attractively by the noble Lords, Lord Pannick and Lord Faulks. Indeed there can, apparently, be a conflict between two very important and sovereign authorities of law—international law and domestic law. However, one has to favour the argument of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick; in other words, however much the attitude of the rule of law in Britain might respect international comity, it would be morally ultra vires to be prepared to perpetrate an injustice in the name of that loyalty. That would be utterly wrong. That, I think, is the answer to the whole question. In other words, as regards the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, our respect for international comity is very considerable but is not absolute. It is ameliorated and qualified by that condition, save and in respect of a situation of perpetrating a blatant injustice. That would be beyond our authority ultra vires.