We’re celebrating National Democracy Week! Find out more

Ellison Review — Statement

Part of the debate – in the House of Lords at 5:24 pm on 6th March 2014.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Paddick Lord Paddick Liberal Democrat 5:24 pm, 6th March 2014

My Lords, as the only former senior police officer present in the House this afternoon, I personally thank the noble Baroness, Lady Lawrence of Clarendon, for her dedication, tenacity and dignity in pursuing these issues when, as she has already said, very few people believed her. We owe a great debt to her for pursuing the case in the way that she has done. I also thank my noble friend the Minister for the compassion that he has shown in both the delivery of his speech and the way that he has responded.

The Ellison review is very worrying. Not only did the Metropolitan Police Service fail to disclose evidence of corruption to the Macpherson inquiry, but both the MPS and the Independent Police Complaints Commission failed to reveal the evidence of corruption that this review has finally discovered. The activities of the Special Demonstration Squad and other undercover officers in infiltrating those supporting the Lawrence family and Duwayne Brooks are also a very serious concern. My concern, on which perhaps the Minister can reassure me, is this: how can a judge-led public inquiry get to the truth when the Macpherson inquiry, also a judge-led public inquiry, failed to do so?


peter martin
Posted on 14 Apr 2014 4:55 pm (Report this annotation)

Lord Paddick is corret, another judge led inquiry will not get to the back of this. The only way to get to the back of this is to read and study my blog.
Type that into top bar on screen.