Woolwich and the EU Council — Statement

Part of the debate – in the House of Lords at 5:41 pm on 3 June 2013.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Davies of Stamford Lord Davies of Stamford Labour 5:41, 3 June 2013

My Lords, the noble Lord said that lifting the EU arms embargo in Syria has provided the basis for individual member states to exercise some influence as and when they decide to sell arms. However, was not the lifting of the EU embargo itself potentially a major instrument of influence on both sides in the Syrian civil war? Would it not have been more sensible to have made lifting that embargo contingent on the behaviour of both parties, for example at the forthcoming Geneva talks? Have we not thrown away a particularly valuable diplomatic instrument rather prematurely?