Climate Change Bill [HL]

Part of the debate – in the House of Lords at 3:30 pm on 14 January 2008.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Crickhowell Lord Crickhowell Conservative 3:30, 14 January 2008

I had not intended to intervene but I want to say that my noble friend made a very good point when he suggested that names matter. I share his doubts about the effectiveness of the word "committee". Having listened to the noble Lord from the Liberal Democrat front bench, I suggest—perhaps out of a sense of nostalgia—that if "commission" is not acceptable, we might consider "authority". I was chairman of the National Rivers Authority. There were those who argued that it should not have been "national" because it did not cover Scotland, but it did give us an authority from the start that a lesser title would not have provided. I believe that, as a consequence, we proved to be a very effective organisation.

I support my noble friend's Amendment because it is important to strengthen the authority by giving it a more powerful name. When we come to Report, if there is some doubt about "commission", I put forward a possible alternative of calling the body the "climate change authority".

Front Bench

The first bench on either side of the House of Commons, reserved for ministers and leaders of the principal political parties.

amendment

As a bill passes through Parliament, MPs and peers may suggest amendments - or changes - which they believe will improve the quality of the legislation.

Many hundreds of amendments are proposed by members to major bills as they pass through committee stage, report stage and third reading in both Houses of Parliament.

In the end only a handful of amendments will be incorporated into any bill.

The Speaker - or the chairman in the case of standing committees - has the power to select which amendments should be debated.