Lords Amendment No. 99

– in the House of Lords at 5:30 pm on 22nd July 2002.

Alert me about debates like this

99 Clause 196, page 120, line 31, at end insert—

"( ) make provision for the payment of debts of the specified person incurred for full consideration before the restraint order was made;"

The Commons disagreed to this amendment for the following reason:

99A Because it is not appropriate to create a preference for unsecured creditors, which would be open to abuse by criminals.

Photo of Lord Falconer of Thoroton Lord Falconer of Thoroton Minister of State (Criminal Policy), Home Office, Minister of State (Home Office) (Criminal Justice System)

My Lords, I beg to move that this House do not insist on their Amendment No. 99 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 99A.

Moved, That the House do not insist on their Amendment No. 99 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 99A.—(Lord Falconer of Thoroton.)

[Amendment No. 99B, as an amendment to the Motion, not moved.]

On Question, Motion agreed to.