Wednesday, 3 March 2021
My Lords, the Hybrid Sitting of the House will now begin. Some Members are here in the Chamber and others are participating remotely, but all Members will be treated equally. I ask all Members to...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the report by KPMG Northampton Borough Council: Report in the public interest regarding the Council’s loans to...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the planned (1) programme, and (2) timetable, for refugee resettlements under the United Kingdom Resettlement Scheme.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how the money replacing funding previously provided by the European Union in Wales will be administered.
My Lords, the Government support the police in the fair and legitimate use of stop and search and, where necessary, reasonable force to tackle criminality and violent crime. We have worked with...
My Lords, the Hybrid Sitting of the House will now resume. I ask Members to respect social distancing.
The following Answer to an Urgent Question was given in the House of Commons on Tuesday 2 March. “I thank my right honourable friend the Member for Sutton Coldfield (Mr Mitchell) for...
The Earl of Courtown:: Moved by The Earl of Courtown: That the Bill be considered on Report in the following order: Clauses 1 to 38, Schedule 1, Clauses 39 to 68, Schedule 2, Clauses 69 to 80, Title.
My Lords, the Hybrid Sitting of the House will now resume. I ask all Members to respect social distancing. I will call Members to speak in the order listed. Short questions of elucidation after...
Clause 1: Offences aggravated by terrorist connection
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames: Moved by Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames 1: Clause 1, page 1, line 8, at end insert—“(aa) after subsection (1) insert—“(1A) The court may...
Lord Carlile of Berriew: Moved by Lord Carlile of Berriew 2: Clause 27, leave out Clause 27 and insert the following new Clause—“Continued imprisonment of terrorist prisoners during...
Lord Stewart of Dirleton: Moved by Lord Stewart of Dirleton 3: Clause 29, page 25, line 6, leave out from “is” to end of line 9 and insert—“(a) a sentence of imprisonment...
Lord Stewart of Dirleton: Moved by Lord Stewart of Dirleton 4: Clause 29, page 25, line 10, after “Part” insert “, except sections 1AB, 1A and 1B,”Member’s...
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames: Moved by Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames 12: After Clause 31, insert the following new Clause—“Review of sections 1 to 31(1) The Secretary of State...
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay: Moved by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay 14: Clause 34, page 29, line 21, leave out “has reasonable grounds for suspecting” and insert “reasonably...
Lord Anderson of Ipswich: Moved by Lord Anderson of Ipswich 16: Clause 35, page 29, line 28, leave out “one or more” and insert “up to three”Member’s explanatory...
Lord Paddick: Moved by Lord Paddick 18: Clause 37, leave out Clause 37Member’s explanatory statementThis would remove Clause 37 (TPIMs: extension of residence measure) from the bill.
Baroness Hamwee: Moved by Baroness Hamwee 19: Clause 38, page 32, line 15, at end insert—“(2A) The Secretary of State must publish a code of practice relating to—(a) the...
Lord Paddick: Moved by Lord Paddick 21: Clause 38, leave out Clause 38Member’s explanatory statementThis would remove Clause 38 (TPIMs: polygraph measure) from the bill.
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay: Moved by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay 22: After Clause 40, insert the following new Clause—“TPIMs: annual review(1) In section 20 of the Terrorism...
Lord Paddick: Moved by Lord Paddick 23: Clause 44, page 35, line 26, leave out subsection (1) and insert—“(1) In section 20(9) of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019...
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar: Moved by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar 26: Clause 48, page 37, line 13, at end insert—“(4A) Nothing in subsections (1) to (4) limits the extent within the United...
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar: Moved by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar 27: Schedule 13, page 121, line 4, leave out from “section” to “for” in line 5 and insert “1 (release of...
Debates in the House of Lords are an opportunity for Peers from all parties (and crossbench peers, and Bishops) to scrutinise government legislation and raise important local, national or topical issues.
And sometimes to shout at each other.
