Thursday, 29 November 2001
asked Her Majesty's Government: How universities can contribute effectively to their review of public spending in higher education without knowing the outcome of their review of student finance.
asked Her Majesty's Government: Who is responsible for considering the possible consequences of major emergencies or acts of terrorism within London and for preparing plans to respond to such events.
My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In doing so, I declare an interest as the new president of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. The...
asked Her Majesty's Government: What are their views on the report from the board of visitors on Downview prison.
My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now again resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved, That the House do now again resolve itself into Committee.—(Lord Rooker.)
rose to move, That the draft regulations laid before the House on 30th October be approved [8th Report from the Joint Committee].
rose to move to resolve, That this House calls on Her Majesty's Government to revoke the Damages (Personal Injury) Order 2001 (S.I. 2001/2301), laid before the House on 27th June 2001.
House again in Committee on Clause 25.
Returned from the Commons agreed to. House adjourned at two minutes past eleven o'clock.
Debates in the House of Lords are an opportunity for Peers from all parties (and crossbench peers, and Bishops) to scrutinise government legislation and raise important local, national or topical issues.
And sometimes to shout at each other.