Rail Renationalisation: East of England

Transport – in the House of Commons at on 26 March 2026.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Peter Prinsley Peter Prinsley Labour, Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket

What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the renationalisation of the railways on rail users in the east of England.

Photo of Heidi Alexander Heidi Alexander The Secretary of State for Transport

On behalf of the Government, may I associate myself with your remarks about David Winnick and extend our condolences to his family?

Bringing Greater Anglia and other east of England train operators into public ownership will put passengers first. Since coming into public ownership in 2025, both Greater Anglia and c2c are delivering some of the lowest cancellation rates in the country, while new stations and upgrades across the region are improving reliability and accessibility as we move towards an integrated, passenger-focused rail network.

Photo of Peter Prinsley Peter Prinsley Labour, Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket

I am grateful for that answer. Greater Anglia has consistently been at the top of the performance scale for our railway operators, but could the Secretary of State tell me whether the nationalisation of the railway will lead to the increased likelihood of a much better commuter service between Bury St Edmunds and Cambridge, which is presently only an hourly service, and what the prospect is of a direct train line from Bury St Edmunds to London?

Photo of Heidi Alexander Heidi Alexander The Secretary of State for Transport

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his advocacy on behalf of his constituents and those using rail services in his area. I can assure him that Greater Anglia continually looks for opportunities to improve service frequency. Services will be strengthened for customers and communities on regional routes, including in the Stowmarket area, in the new timetable from Sunday 17 May. As we work towards the establishment of Great British Railways, we will continue to look for further opportunities to strengthen services.

Photo of Edward Leigh Edward Leigh Father of the House of Commons

Nationalisation was supposed to put local communities in touch. Grimsby is the largest town in the east of England without a direct train to London. We have been campaigning for one for years, and now the Secretary of State has written to me to say that we are not going to get the train because of accessibility problems in Market Rasen station. It is ludicrous to spend £15 million on extending a platform that does not need to be extended and building a bridge that does not need to be built. What does the Secretary of State want me to do? Does she want me to get on my knees and beg for this train? Let me do so now—[Laughter.] My hon. Friend Martin Vickers and I have been campaigning for this for our local community for years.

Photo of Heidi Alexander Heidi Alexander The Secretary of State for Transport

I think that is possibly a first for the Father of the House, and it underlines the strength of feeling that he and his constituents have about improved rail services. He is right; I did write to him on 17 March and confirmed that while we could run trains without major infrastructure changes, we would have to find additional funding to support the necessary service pattern changes. For LNER services to call at Market Rasen, significant upgrades would be needed to the station to enable safe and compliant operation.

Secretary of State

Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

Father of the House

The title Father of the House is given to the MP with the longest unbroken service in the House of Commons.

The most important duty of the Father of the House is to preside over the election of a new speaker should that office be vacant at the beginning of a Parliament.

A minister is never considered the Father of the House, even if that minister is more senior than any other MP.