Parliamentary Scrutiny of New Free Trade Agreements

business and Trade – in the House of Commons at on 9 February 2023.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Liz Twist Liz Twist Opposition Whip (Commons), Shadow Minister (Scotland)

What steps she is taking to support effective parliamentary scrutiny of new free trade agreements.

Photo of Nigel Huddleston Nigel Huddleston Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The Government are committed to transparency and effective scrutiny in our trade agenda, going beyond the statutory framework set out in the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. That includes providing extensive information prior to the commencement of talks on free trade agreements, as well as regular updates to Parliament during negotiations. At the end of negotiations, we have committed to additional parliamentary scrutiny time, as well as to publishing further information such as the advice of the independent Trade and Agriculture Commission.

Photo of Liz Twist Liz Twist Opposition Whip (Commons), Shadow Minister (Scotland)

Over the last year, the Government’s former Environment Secretary, George Eustice, has labelled the Government free trade agreements a failure, and the Prime Minister has called them one-sided. Is such criticism the reason the Government spend so much time avoiding any real detailed scrutiny of these trade agreements?

Photo of Nigel Huddleston Nigel Huddleston Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade)

I respectfully disagree with the hon. Lady’s characterisation that there is insufficient scrutiny, and I respectfully disagree with my right hon. Friend George Eustice, who made some comments earlier this year. Last time I answered this question, you quite rightly had a go at me, Mr Speaker, because I gave a long list of examples of extensive scrutiny on our free trade agreements. I will spare the House by not repeating it , but I refer the hon. Lady to the answer I gave previously.