Part of Oral Answers to Questions — Justice – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 6 December 2016.
Richard Burgon
Shadow Lord Chancellor and Shadow Secretary of State for Justice
12:00,
6 December 2016
Yesterday, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said at the beginning of the article 50 appeal:
“This appeal is concerned with legal issues, and, as judges, our duty is to consider those issues impartially, and to decide the case, according to law. That is what we shall do.”
Does the Lord Chancellor agree that if she had done her duty and spoken out at the time to defend the judiciary, those words would not have been necessary?