Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Review of remuneration of investment fund managers

Finance Bill – in the House of Commons at 5:15 pm on 28th June 2016.

Alert me about debates like this

Votes in this debate

“The Chancellor of the Exchequer must commission a review of ways in which the law could be amended to ensure that no element of the remuneration paid to an investment fund manager may be treated as a capital gain, and that such remuneration shall be treated for tax purposes wholly as income, and must publish the report of the review within six months of the passing of this Act.”—(Roger Mullin.)

Brought up, and read the First time.

Question put, That the clause be read a Second time.

The House divided:

Ayes 259, Noes 315.

Division number 29 Finance Bill — Review of remuneration of investment fund managers

Aye: 258 MPs

No: 314 MPs

Ayes: A-Z by last name


Nos: A-Z by last name


Question accordingly negatived.

The Deputy Speaker resumed the Chair.

Bill (Clauses 7 to 18, 41 to 44, 65 to 18, 129, 132 to 136, and 144 to 154, and schedules 2, 3, 11 to 14, and 18 to 22), as amended, reported, and ordered to lie on the Table.

Photo of Natascha Engel Natascha Engel Deputy Speaker (Second Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means)

Before we move to the four Ways and Means resolutions numbered 2 to 5 on the Order Paper, the Minister has notified me that he wishes to move an additional Ways and Means motion relating to stamp duty. Copies have been in the Vote Office for the past 40 minutes and I hope hon. Members have had an opportunity to read it. The same procedure will apply as for the motions on the Order Paper.