We need your support to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can continue to hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Clause 27 — Changes to existing limits

Part of Access to Mental Health Services – in the House of Commons at 5:30 pm on 10th September 2013.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Angela Smith Angela Smith Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Commons 5:30 pm, 10th September 2013

I will comment on the reduction to the thresholds presently. Suffice it to say at this moment that the Electoral Commission itself has suggested that the thresholds might even need raising, rather than lowering.

There is a real suspicion out there in the third sector that, unfortunately, many Conservatives would like to see charities pare down their role, shrink their campaigning brief and concentrate instead on welfare provision.

That fear has already been borne out in this debate. There is nothing wrong with charities providing help and support for the sick, the young and the old, or for animals in distress—indeed, there is everything right about it—but they also need the freedom to campaign for the legislation and funding that are necessary to make the world a better place.

We have heard the views of Jacob Rees-Mogg on the campaigning role of charities and voluntary organisations. Charlie Elphicke said recently that

“many charities need to renew their sense of mission, spending less time at conferences and more time valuing their volunteers. They should concentrate resources on helping people rather than campaigns, lobbying and administration.”

And Priti Patel