Youth Unemployment and Bank Bonuses

Part of Opposition Day — [Un-allotted Day] – in the House of Commons at 9:29 pm on 23 January 2012.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Richard Graham Richard Graham Conservative, Gloucester 9:29, 23 January 2012

It gives me huge pleasure to join this debate in which we can all surely agree with Rachel Reeves that youth unemployment is too high and must be reduced. As many hon. Members have said, none of us is complacent on this issue, so what to do? The hon. Lady had three main suggestions: spend more, lower VAT, and bash the bankers. There was also a possible fourth suggestion of bringing back the future jobs fund or, as she put it, creating 100,000 jobs. The first of those suggestions has been utterly discredited and the second did not work. On the third suggestion, no Government except those of the ex-USSR and the current Democratic People’s Republic of Korea create jobs. We must be clear that the business of government is about setting the conditions in which businesses can create jobs. It simply does not work when Governments try to create jobs.

On the future jobs fund, the evidence we looked at in the Select Committee on Work and Pensions was absolutely clear: it was expensive and public sector-dominated. It was useful and it did give experience, but no future jobs came from it.