Planning System

Oral Answers to Questions — Communities and Local Government – in the House of Commons at 10:30 am on 21st October 2010.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Richard Graham Richard Graham Conservative, Gloucester 10:30 am, 21st October 2010

What steps he has taken to reduce the burden of administration in the planning system.

Watch this
Embed this video

Copy and paste this code on your website

Hide

Photo of Bob Neill Bob Neill The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Reducing and minimising burdens in the planning system is essential if the system is to work effectively and if we are to remove a financial burden on the economy, which has been estimated in figures quoted in the Killian Pretty report as being up to £2.7 billion a year. That therefore forms a central part of the Government's reform proposals in the localism and decentralisation Bill and the national planning framework. We have already taken specific steps, with which I would be happy to acquaint the House in more detail if time permitted-for example, by consolidating 17 regulations into one and three preservation orders into one, saving £1.5 million already.

Watch this

Photo of Richard Graham Richard Graham Conservative, Gloucester

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. The £400 million redevelopment project in the Gloucester Quays in my constituency was unnecessarily delayed for more than a year as a result of being called in by the previous Government. Does the Minister agree that local planning decisions are now precisely that, that they will no longer be subject to frequent interference by the Government and that today we can send a clear message to developers and investors-in Gloucester and elsewhere-that we are open for business without delay?

Watch this

Photo of Bob Neill Bob Neill The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Localising decision making and planning is central to the Government's policy. Ministers have made it clear that they will exercise the power to call in only very sparingly where matters of significant national interest and policy are concerned.

Watch this

Photo of Clive Betts Clive Betts Chair, Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Is the Minister aware that in looking at the abolition of the regional spatial strategies, the Select Committee is receiving evidence that because those strategies had an evidential base-not merely in respect of house building numbers, but in many other matters on which local development frameworks were based-many local authorities are now having to go back and redo that evidential base at a local level, causing an enormous amount of work and inconvenience to them? Did the Minister take account of those extra burdens when he decided to abolish the regional spatial strategies?

Watch this

Photo of Bob Neill Bob Neill The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

The vast majority of local authorities I have spoken to greatly welcome the abolition of those strategies, which imposed undemocratic targets on them. There is no need to rework the evidence base-it is already there. We have given local authorities the power to revise the figures that were arbitrarily imposed on them from above.

Watch this