Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Local Transport Plan

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport – in the House of Commons at 10:30 am on 22nd October 2009.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of David Heathcoat-Amory David Heathcoat-Amory Conservative, Wells 10:30 am, 22nd October 2009

If his Department will amend the local transport plan criteria to allow local authorities more discretion in approving transport schemes.

Watch this
Embed this video

Copy and paste this code on your website

Hide

Photo of Sadiq Khan Sadiq Khan Minister of State (Department for Transport)

No. Local authorities already have almost complete discretion to invest in transport as they see fit. They are obliged to seek approval only when they are bidding for additional funds from the Department-for example, for major schemes of more than £5 million.

Watch this

Photo of David Heathcoat-Amory David Heathcoat-Amory Conservative, Wells

The truth is that there is a box-ticking mentality in the Department, whereby local authorities have to comply with central Government criteria when allocating road improvement funding. Will the Minister accompany me on the protest march along the Berrow coast road this Saturday, when we will be campaigning for the so-called missing link, where there is no footpath or cycle way at all, in aid and support of local democracy over central Government control?

Watch this

Photo of Sadiq Khan Sadiq Khan Minister of State (Department for Transport)

I think that the right hon. Gentleman made a similar allegation last year about the DFT interfering with what Somerset county council wanted to do, and he was wrong then, too. There are a number of ways in which one can obtain funding for transport projects. First, there is the £1.3 billion of capital funding, which has no strings attached whereby we could stop local authorities from doing what they want. Secondly, there is the revenue support grant: again there is no ring-fencing, and no project is subject to criteria. Thirdly, there are local transport plans. The right hon. Gentleman would expect us to be responsible to the taxpayer for contributions of more than £5 million. This is not about box-ticking; it is about ensuring that taxpayers' money is spent properly and we get value for money. I am sure that he would welcome that approach.

Watch this

Photo of Stephen Hammond Stephen Hammond Shadow Minister (Transport)

As my right hon. Friend Mr. Heathcoat-Amory pointed out, it is to this Government's continuing shame that they are killing off so many innovative local transport schemes by national diktat. When will they do what they have done in so many areas of transport, not least in relation to the question asked by my hon. Friend Mrs. Villiers-drop their policy, follow our policies, and allow local authorities to make truly local decisions?

Watch this

Photo of Sadiq Khan Sadiq Khan Minister of State (Department for Transport)

One of the problems in doing what the hon. Gentleman claims to want to do is that his party in Westminster disagrees fundamentally with the Mayor of London on so many issues, whether it be Crossrail, an estuary airport or speed cameras. On funding, the hon. Gentleman should be aware-if he is not, I am again happy to undertake to write to him to educate him-that any major funding scheme below £5 million needs no approval from the Department for Transport. It is right and proper that we have a duty to taxpayers to ensure that money is spent properly, but there is a light-touch approach. When a major project is submitted to the Department, we work with those involved to ensure value for money and deliverability. I do not apologise for ensuring that every penny of taxpayers' money is spent properly.

Watch this