Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Petition — Planning and Development (Cheshire)

– in the House of Commons at 6:01 pm on 12th March 2009.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Stephen O'Brien Stephen O'Brien Shadow Minister (Health) 6:01 pm, 12th March 2009

I am very pleased to have the opportunity to present a petition on behalf of my constituents—based mainly in Tarporley—following the collection of signatures by a sincere and unselfish, but concerned, community action group. It has managed to gather in a very short space of time many hundreds of signatures, and it has my full support in objecting to the resubmission of an application for a so-called continuing care community development in the Tarporley area. It is through petitions that Members have the opportunity to stand up for both proportionality and balance in our communities. While planning is not a matter of immediate relevance to this House, it is vital that we state any objections on the public record through petitions.

The petition states:

The Petition of residents of Tarporley and surrounding areas,

Declares that Vale Royal Borough Council should reject the planning application reference 08-2866-FUM for the development of a continuing care community on land adjacent to Heatherways, Tarporley, due to the negative impact on the village and its amenities that such a development would cause.

The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to indicate to Vale Royal Borough Council that this application is not substantially different from the previous application 08-0779-FUM and so must therefore be opposed by Vale Royal Borough Council for the same reasons; and instruct Vale Royal Borough Council to place on public record that due to the negative impact on the village and its amenities such a development would cause, the proposed site is confirmed as unsuitable for such a development in the future.

And the Petitioners remain, etc.


Watch this
Embed this video

Copy and paste this code on your website


I have followed this with interest particularly in view of the fact that a similiar submission has been made in Christleton Village and ajacent to the trunk road the A41. Gerald Morris.

Submitted by Josephgerald Morris