Oral Answers to Questions — Treasury – in the House of Commons at 10:30 am on 12 July 2007.
Nadine Dorries
Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire
10:30,
12 July 2007
What recent steps he has taken to tighten controls on the movement of terrorist assets.
Kitty Ussher
Economic Secretary, HM Treasury
Earlier this year, we set out new measures to tighten controls on terrorist assets, including protecting the charitable sector from the risk of terrorist exploitation, licensing those who own or control a money service business, and promoting the proactive use of asset freezing powers, including the creation of a dedicated Treasury asset freezing unit. I am pleased to say that last week the Financial Action Task Force ranked the UK as the first country to be fully compliant with international standards on terrorist asset freezing. In the second quarter of this year, we made three domestic asset freezing designations under the orders on terrorism and al-Qaeda, and this week I made a further domestic designation.
Nadine Dorries
Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire
Tackling money laundering also means, in the words of the Prime Minister, that there should be
"no safe haven for terrorists" and
"no safe hiding place for their funds."
If that is the case, why was Abu Hamza able to buy a £220,000 semi-detached house in Greenford for cash, two years after his assets were supposed to have been frozen by the Treasury?
Kitty Ussher
Economic Secretary, HM Treasury
The police have conducted their own investigation into that case, and I know that the hon. Lady's colleague, Mr. Hands, has raised the issue with my predecessor in an Adjournment Debate. The police were absolutely satisfied that, because no asset was transferred to the designated person, there was no cause for concern.
Keith Vaz
Member, Labour Party National Executive Committee
I welcome my hon. Friend to her new responsibilities and wish her well in them. Britain, of course, cannot do this alone. Is it not important to work with international partners to ensure that what we do here is replicated in the European Union, for example? What plans does she have to work with our EU colleagues to ensure that they adopt practices similar to ours?
Kitty Ussher
Economic Secretary, HM Treasury
I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his kind remarks, and I can reassure him that we are in constant contact with our European Union partners on this issue. Indeed, I shall be travelling to Brussels this evening for the budget ECOFIN, where we will support the EU budget lines precisely on these measures.
An adjournment debate is a short half hour debate that is introduced by a backbencher at the end of each day's business in the House of Commons.
Adjournment debates are also held in the side chamber of Westminster Hall.
This technical procedure of debating a motion that the House should adjourn gives backbench members the opportunity to discuss issues of concern to them, and to have a minister respond to the points they raise.
The speaker holds a weekly ballot in order to decide which backbench members will get to choose the subject for each daily debate.
Backbenchers normally use this as an opportunity to debate issues related to their constituency.
An all-day adjournment debate is normally held on the final day before each parliamentary recess begins. On these occasions MPs do not have to give advance notice of the subjects which they intend to raise.
The leader of the House replies at the end of the debate to all of the issues raised.