Clause 16 — Retro-reflective markings

Part of Delegated Legislation – in the House of Commons at 8:00 pm on 6 November 2006.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Greg Knight Greg Knight Chair, Procedure Committee 8:00, 6 November 2006

I would like to probe that point a little further. The Minister said that he did not want clause 16, or the two Lords amendments to it, in the Bill. His words were that he preferred to rely on the existing legal mechanisms. Is he saying that if we agree to remove clause 16 from the Bill and do not include Lords amendments Nos. 5A and 5B, and, at a point in the future, the European Union determines that reflective markings should be affixed to vehicles, he will not have to come back to the House to seek permission to implement that? If that is not what the Minister is saying, why does he not accept that clause 16 should remain in the Bill and resist merely Lords amendments Nos. 5A and 5B, which would impose a time limit?