Police Force Mergers

Part of Oral Answers to Questions — Home Department – in the House of Commons at 2:30 pm on 15 May 2006.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of John Reid John Reid Home Secretary, The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2:30, 15 May 2006

I know that my hon. Friend is a doughty fighter for the interests of her own area. She will know that there are a considerable number of police officers on the beat and in the forces who were not there when the new Labour Government took office in 1997. There are about 13,000 more police officers. In addition, far more of them are on the beat than previously. Neighbourhood policing teams, as well as the back-ups from antisocial behaviour personnel and community wardens, and so on, mean that the capability of the police in combating crime and restoring order is far greater.

It is true that any restructuring will be aimed at further enhancing that capability. That is the intention. This will be costly, but we have already made it plain that although restructuring will be expensive we have undertaken to meet the net reasonable costs that arise as a direct result. At this early stage, I cannot speak with great authority about the position on the street in Luton. I undertake to educate myself on that in the not too distant future, and to write to my hon. Friend.

Annotations

Callum Wood.
Posted on 21 May 2006 4:50 pm (Report this annotation)

Police presence is one thing - but in my local council, there's a north/south divide, and losing the police HQ to Huddersfield in the south, along with control of the council, etc, would be really annoying.

I don't see how merging police forces would enhance capability - as I see it, it would make them more aloof and much less accountable.