Oral Answers to Questions — Millennium Dome

Part of the debate – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 30 April 2001.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Peter Ainsworth Peter Ainsworth Conservative, East Surrey 12:00, 30 April 2001

Only £600,000 a month—that's okay then. The Minister claimed, as she has done on previous occasions, that the dome somehow contributes to regeneration in Greenwich. When will the Government realise that it is part of the problem, not the solution? When will they face the fact that it is an obstacle to the important task of creating jobs, prosperity and economic vitality in Greenwich?

Having failed to sell it twice, the Government hope that everyone will forget it. People will not forget. The dome was supposed to be good for tourism, but when thousands of small businesses face ruin, is not it obscene that it sits there, closed but costing millions of pounds to the public purse? Is not that the price of new Labour's vanity?