Part of the debate – in the House of Commons at 4:27 pm on 7 April 1998.
The Secretary of State is now employing a wriggling, slippery, lawyer's argument to extend the definition of additionality far enough to encompass everything that he wants to do. The Prime Minister's words in the White Paper are in inverted commas, so the Secretary of State may want to distance himself from them. He said:
We don't believe it would be right to use Lottery money to pay for things which are the Government's responsibilities".
That is perfectly clear—no ifs, no buts, no maybes and no provisos—but it is ignored in the Bill.