My hon. and learned Friend precisely states the situation. The fact that we can post £5 billion-worth of new economic activity at a time when the Opposition are criticising us on investment shows the true effectiveness of our economic policy. I note that, with regard to private finance in the Prison Service, on the one hand the Opposition call for tougher measures on law and order and then announce that in principle they are against private money building new prisons.
The Minister will be aware that the Belgian high-speed rail link to the channel tunnel is being built and that the French high-speed rail network has been operating for a number of years, yet in Britain this week fundamental questions have been raised about whether our high-speed rail link to the channel tunnel can be funded. In those circumstances, does the Minister agree that the Government's priority should be investment in infrastructure before the abolition of capital gains tax and inheritance tax?
What is fundamental is that the high-speed channel rail link—a project valued at some £2.7 billion—is being actively competed for; the four original bidders are now down to the final two. Private sector companies want to make this investment and they will do so, to the benefit of our transport infrastructure.
Does my hon. Friend agree that the crossrail project offers one of the best prospects for private finance and is of particular importance for the regeneration of the economy of London and the south-east? Will he and his colleagues in government do everything possible to facilitate it?
My hon. Friend is right to point out how private capital can further develop London's transport infrastructure. I add to his joy on that, because we also have PFI help for 100 extra trains on the Northern line. Again, that is an example of how much-needed public investment in infrastructure has been achieved under this remarkable initiative.