Police Numbers

Oral Answers to Questions — Home Department – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 24th June 1993.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Malcolm Moss Malcolm Moss , North East Cambridgeshire 12:00 am, 24th June 1993

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how he intends to change procedures for determining the number of police officers in each police force.

Photo of Charles Wardle Charles Wardle , Bexhill and Battle

My right hon. and learned Friend will be making a statement in the near future when he lays before Parliament his White Paper on police reform.

Photo of Malcolm Moss Malcolm Moss , North East Cambridgeshire

Does my hon. Friend recognise that chief constables will warmly welcome the freedom to take their own decisions regarding manpower levels? Is it not absurd that the knee-jerk opposition to the proposals so aptly shown by Labour Members will lead them to oppose a reform which will give chief constables the option of putting more police on the beat?

Photo of Charles Wardle Charles Wardle , Bexhill and Battle

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Under the present system, a chief officer who wishes to increase his funding effectively has to express his bid in terms of additional police officers, but it cannot make sense for the Home Office to determine how many officers each force should have. It must be up to the chief officers to decide on the basis of local intelligence and local needs.

Photo of Mike O'Brien Mike O'Brien , North Warwickshire

May I express my surprise that the new Secretary of State expressed support for the Criminal Justice Act 1991, which we are currently in the process of seeking to amend? Will his support for more policemen on the beat be enhanced by the Government's proposals for restrictions on spending on police recruitment for the next three years?

Photo of Charles Wardle Charles Wardle , Bexhill and Battle

Many aspects of the 1991 Act made a great deal of sense. If the hon. Gentleman is following the Committee proceedings on the Bill, he will understand how it is now to be improved.

As for police funding, the hon. Gentleman and the House must agree that it is up to chief officers to use their resources and to decide what to spend on manpower and what to spend on equipment. That must make sense.

Photo of Mr Gyles Brandreth Mr Gyles Brandreth , City of Chester

Does my hon. Friend agree that in the past 14 years police numbers have risen by 16,500 and funding for them has risen by about 80 per cent? That shows the priority that we attach to the police. Does he agree that civilianisation and other ways of putting more police on the beat are to be encouraged and that it must be up to the local chief constables to decide how best to serve the community?

Photo of Charles Wardle Charles Wardle , Bexhill and Battle

My hon. Friend is right. In addition to the statistics that he has just provided, I am sure that he will bear in mind the fact that, since 1979, almost 15,000 more civilian posts have been created and about 6,600 uniformed officers have been released for beat duties as a result of the civilianisation process.

It must be up to chief officers to decide how to deploy their resources. The House will understand that I cannot speculate about the White Paper, but some pointers were provided in the statement on 23 March. I can assure the House that the theme of the White Paper will be partnership between the police and public, and locally based and locally organised policing—so much was clear from the statement.