– in the House of Commons at 3:33 pm on 14 October 1991.
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
3:33,
14 October 1991
With permission, Mr. Speaker, I should like to make a short business statement. The business for Wednesday 16 October will now be a debate on an Opposition motion described as "The Decline of the Manufacturing Economy." Business will remain as announced for the remainder of the week.
The House will also wish to know that European Standing Committee A will meet at 10.30 am on Wednesday 16 October to consider European Community Document No. 4315/91 relating to the safe transport of workers with reduced mobility.
Dr Jack Cunningham
Chair, House of Commons (Services): Computer Sub-Committee, Shadow Leader of the House of Commons
Does the Leader of the House recognise that many people in the country as well as in the House are surprised that we have not had a statement today from the Secretary of State for Health about the Government's further proposals for creeping privatisation of the national health service? [Interruption.] As the Government are so proud of their policies, I am surprised that there is any objection from the Government Benches. May we have an assurance that we shall have a statement from the Secretary of State for Health tomorrow and that the statement will not be used on Wednesday to eat into the important Opposition debate on industry, especially when, as a result of the Government's policy failures, redundancies sadly continue to take place thick and fast in our manufacturing industrial base?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
We shall respond in full on manufacturing and the issue for debate on Wednesday during that debate. The hon. Gentleman suggested that there should be a statement today. There is not a statement because there are simply no charges to respond to. I noticed that the hon. Gentleman today talked about creeping privatisation. I noticed that his right hon. Friend the Member for Manchester, Gorton (Mr. Kaufman) on Saturday said that the Prime Minister
denies that the Tories intend to privatise the NHS. … His record says they would. After all, they've privatised nearly everything else''.
Is not that meant to convey to everyone that, as with British Gas or the National Freight Corporation, there would be a complete sale to the private sector—which, after all, is what privatisation means? That was on Saturday. Now everyone agrees that that is a complete fabrication and that the Government have never had any intention of doing that, so by Sunday it was changed to "creeping privatisation". That is meant to refer to contracting out, charges and the other reforms designed to improve the management of the national health service and to increase the resources going directly to patient care.
It is clear that the original charge was a complete fabrication and that the Labour party can no longer even pretend to wish to put it. It is now retreating and that is why there is no need for a statement today.
Mr Bernard Weatherill
, Croydon North East
Order. May I remind hon. Members that we have two other statements today and no fewer than 38 right hon. and hon. Members seeking to participate in the first day of the defence debate? Questions should be confined to business on Wednesday.
Mr Barney Hayhoe
, Brentford and Isleworth
Following the remarks of the Shadow Leader of the House, and now that the Labour party is in the process of resiling from and withdrawing the shameless and sleazy allegations that the Government intend to privatise the health service, will my right hon. Friend provide an opportunity for the Opposition to apologise to the country and to those vulnerable members of the community who have been caused needless anxiety by the wholly unjustified and inaccurate smears made by Labour politicians? The sooner they apologise, the better.
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
My right hon. Friend is entirely right. He is right to say that the smears were wholly unjustified and that the Labour party is retreating from them. It is important that the Labour party is honest now with the British people on these matters. It could have had an opportunity to debate them on Wednesday during the Opposition Supply day. We shall not lose any opportunity to point out the inaccuracy of the charges on creeping privatisation that Labour Members now make as a retreat from their previous quite unjustified charges.
Mr Archy Kirkwood
, Roxburgh and Berwickshire
Is not the answer to the question raised by the Shadow Leader of the House that, if the official Opposition were that keen on having a debate on health, they could have had it on Wednesday? The whole argument is being skewed and diverted from the real problem, which is the lack of funding that is available to the national health service. When shall we have a debate on that important subject? Could the Leader of the House also say something about the date of Prorogation?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
On the second point, I hope to be able to give the date of Prorogation on Thursday when I make my business statement. On the first point, if we had had a debate on the health service—I had just made the point that the hon. Gentleman makes—we would have pointed out that funding of the health service is up by over 50 per cent. in real terms and that the purpose of the NHS reforms is to ensure that that vastly increased resource is increasingly devoted directly to patient care and that services are provided as efficiently as possible. That is where the debate should be. That is what we should like to debate, as would the Liberal Democrat party, but the Labour party is diverting attention from that precisely because it has nothing to say on these issues.
Mr Robin Squire
, Hornchurch
Does my right hon. Friend agree in the light of the extraordinary comments that have emanated in the past weeks from the Opposition that their refusal to select that subject for debate on Wednesday shows an inherent weakness in their case? Will he give these Benches the earliest opportunity of a debate to expose that still further?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
I should be happy for my hon. Friend and all my hon. Friends to find such opportunities in the various debates and other motions in the period ahead. I am sure that when we come to the Loyal Address, for example, there will be opportunities, if the charge is still being repeated, which it may well not be, to expose the case.
Mr Bernard Weatherill
, Croydon North East
Order. We have other statements. I shall allow two further questions from each side, but please confine them to the business for this week.
Mr Robert Hughes
, Aberdeen North
Will the Leader of the House arrange immediately for the Secretary of State for Scotland to come to the House and explain why he is not following the citizens charter in relation to representations being made on defence? Is the Leader of the House aware that the Minister of State, Scottish Office has refused to meet a deputation from the north-east of Scotland to discuss Robert Gordon's Institute of Technology, on the ground that such discussions would serve no useful purpose? How can that possibly be consultation?
Secondly, will the Leader of the House guarantee that there will be no statement on television franchises on Wednesday?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
Yes, I can give that guarantee, because, as the hon. Gentleman knows, that is a matter for the Independent Television Commission. I shall pass on his opening comments to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland.
Mrs Elaine Kellett
, Lancaster
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the reason why the Labour party funked asking for a debate on the health service on Wednesday, in addition to those given by him and my other right hon. Friends, is that the last time it had such a debate the Labour Benches were almost completely empty?
David Winnick
, Walsall North
Is the Leader of the House aware that the Tory record is so disastrous in so many areas that there are simply not enough Opposition Supply days to keep up with them? Is he aware that we would welcome more Supply days to discuss the appalling record on the health service and the many other sectors where the Tory Government have proven so incompetent?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
Even the hon. Gentleman had a smile on his face when he asked that question.
Mr John Bowis
, Battersea
Does my right hon. Friend agree that he would be failing in his duty if, in the coming week, he did not provide the opportunity for the Labour spokesman to apologise not only to the House but to the lady whose husband died and whom the Labour party used in its party political broadcast against the family's wishes, and to the doctor from Bradford who accused the Labour party of dirty tricks? Does he agree that the Labour party should apologise to the people of the country, not just to the House of Commons?
Mr John MacGregor
Chair, Privileges Committee, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House Lords (Privy Council Office), Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Privy Council Office), Chair, Privileges Committee
I must say that there have been many recent examples of unfair, inaccurate, false smears. Such scaremongering is absolutely not in the interests of the health service or patients. It shows the bankruptcy of ideas of the Labour party.
In a normal session there are up to ten standing committees on bills. Each has a chair and from 16 to 50 members. Standing committee members on bills are appointed afresh for each new bill by the Committee of Selection which is required to take account of the composition of the House of Commons (ie. party proportions) as well as the qualification of members to be nominated. The committees are chaired by a member of the Chairmen's Panel (whose members are appointed by the Speaker). In standing committees the Chairman has much the same function as the Speaker in the House of Commons. Like the Speaker, a chairman votes only in the event of a tie, and then usually in accordance with precedent. The committees consider each bill clause by clause and may make amendments. There are no standing committees in the House of Lords.
The Speaker is an MP who has been elected to act as Chairman during debates in the House of Commons. He or she is responsible for ensuring that the rules laid down by the House for the carrying out of its business are observed. It is the Speaker who calls MPs to speak, and maintains order in the House. He or she acts as the House's representative in its relations with outside bodies and the other elements of Parliament such as the Lords and the Monarch. The Speaker is also responsible for protecting the interests of minorities in the House. He or she must ensure that the holders of an opinion, however unpopular, are allowed to put across their view without undue obstruction. It is also the Speaker who reprimands, on behalf of the House, an MP brought to the Bar of the House. In the case of disobedience the Speaker can 'name' an MP which results in their suspension from the House for a period. The Speaker must be impartial in all matters. He or she is elected by MPs in the House of Commons but then ceases to be involved in party politics. All sides in the House rely on the Speaker's disinterest. Even after retirement a former Speaker will not take part in political issues. Taking on the office means losing close contact with old colleagues and keeping apart from all groups and interests, even avoiding using the House of Commons dining rooms or bars. The Speaker continues as a Member of Parliament dealing with constituent's letters and problems. By tradition other candidates from the major parties do not contest the Speaker's seat at a General Election. The Speakership dates back to 1377 when Sir Thomas Hungerford was appointed to the role. The title Speaker comes from the fact that the Speaker was the official spokesman of the House of Commons to the Monarch. In the early years of the office, several Speakers suffered violent deaths when they presented unwelcome news to the King. Further information can be obtained from factsheet M2 on the UK Parliament website.
The Opposition are the political parties in the House of Commons other than the largest or Government party. They are called the Opposition because they sit on the benches opposite the Government in the House of Commons Chamber. The largest of the Opposition parties is known as Her Majesty's Opposition. The role of the Official Opposition is to question and scrutinise the work of Government. The Opposition often votes against the Government. In a sense the Official Opposition is the "Government in waiting".
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
The shadow cabinet is the name given to the group of senior members from the chief opposition party who would form the cabinet if they were to come to power after a General Election. Each member of the shadow cabinet is allocated responsibility for `shadowing' the work of one of the members of the real cabinet.
The Party Leader assigns specific portfolios according to the ability, seniority and popularity of the shadow cabinet's members.
Prorogation takes the form of an announcement on behalf of the Queen by the Lord Chancellor in which he reviews the session's work.
Prorogation brings to an end parliamentary business for that sitting. There are some excpetions as to what Bills can be carried over to the next parliamentary session.
House of Parliament 'Major Parliamentary Occasions - http://www.parliament.uk/works/occasion.cfm#prorog
BBC News A-Z Parliament - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/a-z_of_parliament/p-q/82524.stm
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
The political party system in the English-speaking world evolved in the 17th century, during the fight over the ascension of James the Second to the Throne. James was a Catholic and a Stuart. Those who argued for Parliamentary supremacy were called Whigs, after a Scottish word whiggamore, meaning "horse-driver," applied to Protestant rebels. It was meant as an insult.
They were opposed by Tories, from the Irish word toraidhe (literally, "pursuer," but commonly applied to highwaymen and cow thieves). It was used — obviously derisively — to refer to those who supported the Crown.
By the mid 1700s, the words Tory and Whig were commonly used to describe two political groupings. Tories supported the Church of England, the Crown, and the country gentry, while Whigs supported the rights of religious dissent and the rising industrial bourgeoisie. In the 19th century, Whigs became Liberals; Tories became Conservatives.
The House of Commons is one of the houses of parliament. Here, elected MPs (elected by the "commons", i.e. the people) debate. In modern times, nearly all power resides in this house. In the commons are 650 MPs, as well as a speaker and three deputy speakers.
