Standard Grade Development Programme

Oral Answers to Questions — Scotland – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 5 July 1989.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Mr Jimmy Dunnachie Mr Jimmy Dunnachie , Glasgow Pollok 12:00, 5 July 1989

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the funding of the Government's standard grade development programme, particularly in relation to technological studies, computing studies and office information studies.

Photo of Mr Michael Forsyth Mr Michael Forsyth , Stirling

To date, more than £37 million has been spent or provided for specifically for standard grade. This includes more than £9 million within local authorities' capital allocations for the purchase of scientific and technological equipment.

Photo of Mr Jimmy Dunnachie Mr Jimmy Dunnachie , Glasgow Pollok

It is obvious that the Minister has not met senior education officials in Strathclyde, who have expressed to me their grave concern about the severe underfunding of these important subjects in education and have asked me to ask the Minister to think again and to put money into these subjects so as to allow the young people of Scotland to be trained so as to enable them to compete in the new industries that are supposed to be coming to Scotland. Those education officials tell me that if they do not get the money they will view the future of those subjects with grave concern.

Photo of Mr Michael Forsyth Mr Michael Forsyth , Stirling

I am surprised that the education authorities are making their representations through the hon. Gentleman. The Scottish Education Department has received no representations of the kind that he has described. The education authorities have had substantial provision. If the Educational Institute of Scotland is worried about standard grade, it should address its criticisms in the first instance to the education authorities, to which adequate provision has been made.

I should say in defence of the Educational Institute of Scotland that its executive took a different position from that of its conference and opposed any boycott of standard grade. It is unfortunate that the annual general meeting took such a view, and I hope that the teachers who have implemented standard grade so successfully will continue to make a contribution.

Photo of Tom Clarke Tom Clarke Shadow Minister (Disability)

Does the Minister accept that there is an important role in all this for the Scottish Council for Educational Technology? Will he therefore ensure that it is properly resourced, including proper funding for the Scottish central film library and the Scottish film archives, which have made a major contribution to technology in our time?

Photo of Mr Michael Forsyth Mr Michael Forsyth , Stirling

As the hon. Gentleman knows, the Government have been sensitive to the needs of the Scottish film industry. I recall the hon. Gentleman telling me privately how pleased he was at the Government's announcement following our review. I am sorry that he is not prepared to say publicly in the House what he was prepared to say privately—[Interruption.]

Photo of Tom Clarke Tom Clarke Shadow Minister (Disability)

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I have never at any time—

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

Order. Does the hon. Gentleman wish to raise the matter on the Adjournment?

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

Order. This all takes time out of other hon. Members' questions.

Photo of Tom Clarke Tom Clarke Shadow Minister (Disability)

The Minister has clearly misunderstood the meetings which took place about the Scottish Film Council and has confused it with the Scottish central film library. I believe that that was a genuine misunderstanding and that he should withdraw what he said.