Bus Services

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 3rd December 1984.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Mr Peter Snape Mr Peter Snape , West Bromwich East 12:00 am, 3rd December 1984

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many replies he has received to his consultation document on the deregulation of bus services; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Mr Gordon Bagier Mr Gordon Bagier , Sunderland South

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many replies he has received to his consultation document on subsidies to local bus services; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Robert Wareing Robert Wareing , Liverpool, West Derby

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many responses he has received to the White Paper, "Buses". Cmnd. 9300 and the related consultation papers; what percentage have been favourable and what percentage unfavourable; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I have received over 3,000 responses to the White Paper and the consultation documents which my Department issued subsequently. We are studying those representations as part of the preparation of the forthcoming Bill.

Photo of Mr Peter Snape Mr Peter Snape , West Bromwich East

Has the Secretary of State seen the report from Conservative-controlled Hertfordshire district council, which estimates that the Government's bus proposals will cost the council £3 for every £1 saved? Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that for Conservative-controlled Hertfordshire district council to join the Conservative-controlled Association of County Councils and the Conservative-controlled Association of District Councils in criticising those proposals means that Conservatives outside the House of Commons are extremely worried about the future of their bus services? Does some peculiar reason draw the right hon. Gentleman continually to the Dispatch Box to make a fool of himself?

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I have seen the report in The Guardian today. I have always thought that it was better to read The Guardian carefully. The hon. Gentleman has failed to do so and has made a fool of himself this afternoon. The hon. Gentleman will, of course, be aware that The Guardian report on Hertfordshire was referring to transport supplementary grant and not to the bus policy.

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

Order. I shall hear points of order later.

Photo of Dr Brian Mawhinney Dr Brian Mawhinney , Peterborough

What about my question No. 7?

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

Order. Questions No. 8 and 13 were linked with question No. 6. Mr. Gordon Bagier is not here. I therefore called Mr. Robert Wareing.

Photo of Robert Wareing Robert Wareing , Liverpool, West Derby

As the Secretary of State is actively promoting the co-ordination and integration of transport fares and services in London, why does he insist on attempting to dismantle the very system that is allowing Merseyside and other major conurbations to have an integrated and co-ordinated system of transport fares and services? Is this not peculiar?

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I pay tribute to Merseyside in the sense that the Greater London council has done even more damage to London Transport than Merseyside has done to its transport organisation. As a result, London Regional Transport will take longer to recover from that unfortunate experience. After that, we can see about applying the policy.

Photo of Mrs Elaine Kellett Mrs Elaine Kellett , Lancaster

In view of the scurrilous campaign being conducted by the Labour-controlled Lancashire county council at a cost to ratepayers of £135,000 against my right hon. Friend's plans to modernise and improve the public transport services, will he assure my rural constituents that they will be infinitely better off under the new plans than they are at present?

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I am happy to agree with my hon. Friend. Under the new policy we shall have a better, more flexible and more extensive system of rural bus transport. If Lancashire county council had not indulged in the expenditure to which my hon. Friend referred, it would have been able to afford several more rural bus services for the amount of money it spent on political propaganda.

Photo of Mr John Cartwright Mr John Cartwright , Woolwich

Why does the Secretary of State believe that the limited experience of bus deregulation in an area such as Hereford and Worcester can be automatically translated into the different situation in the great industrial conurbations, which depend on an integrated bus system?

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I never made that claim. I said that what has happened in Hereford and Worcester is a good guide to what will happen in the rural areas. I never extended that to what will happen in the urban areas. I believe that great savings can be made through competition to enable county councils to purchase more services as well as to cut their costs.

Photo of Gwyneth Dunwoody Gwyneth Dunwoody , Crewe and Nantwich

If the Secretary of State is so convinced that Hereford is a good example, why were operators not prepared to tender for rural services? Will the right hon. Gentleman be honest and explain that, except on populated routes, people in rural areas will be deprived of bus transport?

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

The hon. Lady should do her homework and go to Hereford and Worcester and ask the people on the streets what they think about their new bus services.

Photo of Hon. Nicholas Ridley Hon. Nicholas Ridley , Cirencester and Tewkesbury

I think she will find that in both the towns and the rural areas the bus services are better. The hon. Lady is wrong to say that rural routes are being withdrawn, because they are not.