Oral Answers to Questions — Environment – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 6 July 1983.
Mr John Ward
, Poole
12:00,
6 July 1983
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the average rate increases in 1983–84 for each class of authority.
Mr William Waldegrave
, Bristol West
With permission, I will arrange for the figures to be circulated in the Official Report.
Mr John Ward
, Poole
I thank my hon. Friend for that somewhat short reply. I trust that when he publishes the figures they will prove conclusively the need to get rid of the metropolitan authorities so that we can reduce the rates charged by local authorities.
Mr William Waldegrave
, Bristol West
There are nine categories of authority in the answer, and the House usually is not happy when long lists are read out.
My hon. Friend is right. The average rate increase of the metropolitan counties is well above that for the country as a whole. My hon. Friend will find various other factors that will interest him. Analysis will show that if one has the misfortune to be in a Labour county one is likely to have an above average rate: if one has the misfortune to be in a Labour district one is likely to have an above average rate; and if one has the misfortune to be in both one will pay well above the average rate.
Dennis Skinner
Member, Labour Party National Executive Committee
Does the Minister accept that one reason for the increase in rates, apart from the reduction in rate support grant, is the fact that back in the early 1970s a Tory Government promised to get rid of rates altogether and then decided to reorganise local government, which cost a fortune? Does he further accept that before the General Election they promised to introduce a poll tax and to get rid of rates once again? They have promised to reorganise local government, and that will cost a fortune. Can we really believe anything the Tories say?
Mr William Waldegrave
, Bristol West
The figures that we have published show that if the 18 top rating authorities in the country had rated on target there would be no average increase in rates in England.
Mr Kenneth Lewis
, Stamford and Spalding
Whey my hon. Friend is considering these figures, will he resist the temptation to prevent local authorities from increasing their rates—notwithstanding the fact that we want them to keep them down— because the electorate will see to that in the domestic area? Will he, however, put a cap on the increase that these councils can impose on business rates, because businesses have no vote?
Mr William Waldegrave
, Bristol West
Any action that the Government take will bite against very few authorities. As I mentioned, 18 authorities — all Labour authorities — could have brought us right back to target. The great Majority of authorities—up to 80 per cent. of them—both Labour and Conservative, are rating within 2 per cent. of target. Our proposals need frighten none of those responsible authorities.
Mr Peter Hardy
, Wentworth
Will the Minister confirm that the share of local expenditure met by central funds is lower than it has been in living memory? Will he further confirm that there is growing suspicion about the inequitability of the distribution of central support and that it is strongly suspected in the metropolitan areas that southern areas and the shire counties have done extremely well? Does he agree that this suggests that, if the Government are really concerned with the whole of England and Wales, they should reconsider the matter carefully?
Mr William Waldegrave
, Bristol West
My right hon. Friend is always willing to receive representations about the exact workings of the GRE formula, but the representatives of some of those southern authorities will not endorse what the hon. Gentleman says.
Following are the figures:
| The average local rate or precept increases between 1982–83 and 1983–84 for each class of authority in England were | |
| Per cent. | |
| Shire counties | 5·9 |
| Shire districts | 0·9 |
| Metropolitan counties | 7·4 |
| Metropolitan districts | 3·5 |
| Inner London boroughs (including the City) | 15·7 |
| Outer London boroughs | 6·4 |
| GLC | 14·7 |
| ILEA | 8·5 |
| England (general rates) | 6·4 |
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
In a general election, each constituency chooses an MP to represent it by process of election. The party who wins the most seats in parliament is in power, with its leader becoming Prime Minister and its Ministers/Shadow Ministers making up the new Cabinet. If no party has a majority, this is known as a hung Parliament. The next general election will take place on or before 3rd June 2010.
The political party system in the English-speaking world evolved in the 17th century, during the fight over the ascension of James the Second to the Throne. James was a Catholic and a Stuart. Those who argued for Parliamentary supremacy were called Whigs, after a Scottish word whiggamore, meaning "horse-driver," applied to Protestant rebels. It was meant as an insult.
They were opposed by Tories, from the Irish word toraidhe (literally, "pursuer," but commonly applied to highwaymen and cow thieves). It was used — obviously derisively — to refer to those who supported the Crown.
By the mid 1700s, the words Tory and Whig were commonly used to describe two political groupings. Tories supported the Church of England, the Crown, and the country gentry, while Whigs supported the rights of religious dissent and the rising industrial bourgeoisie. In the 19th century, Whigs became Liberals; Tories became Conservatives.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
The term "majority" is used in two ways in Parliament. Firstly a Government cannot operate effectively unless it can command a majority in the House of Commons - a majority means winning more than 50% of the votes in a division. Should a Government fail to hold the confidence of the House, it has to hold a General Election. Secondly the term can also be used in an election, where it refers to the margin which the candidate with the most votes has over the candidate coming second. To win a seat a candidate need only have a majority of 1.
