The Lord Chancellor considers applications on their merits in the light of the provisions of section 3(4) of the Public Records Act 1958 and in the light of the policy laid down by section 5 regarding closure after transfer. In considering applications under section 5 of the Act the Lord Chancellor has regard to these provisions and the criteria set out in paragraph 26 of the White Paper "Modern Public Records".
May we know more about the criteria? What possible sense is there in relating all the Foreign Office intercepts that took place during the second world war while refusing to release those that took place between the first and second world wars, with the exception of those that Lloyd George took away and placed in the House of Lords Library? Is it not reasonable to assume that the years between 1919 and 1939 are now history?
I understand the hon. Gentleman's great interest in this matter. The matter has been considered with great care, especially with regard to second world war intercepts. The arguments for exempting security and intelligence-related records from public release have less weight in relation to records of interceptions of messages transmitted by the services of a country with which the United Kingdom was then at war.
Is there any truth in reports that public records dealing with the British Union of Fascists are likely to be witheld for the full 100 years? Bearing in mind that attempts were made a few years ago to withdraw certain Metropolitan police records relating to the hunger marches of 1933 and 1934, which were later countermanded, is there not a case for great vigilance in these matters to ensure that too many exceptions to the 30-year rule are not allowed?