Water and Sewerage

Oral Answers to Questions — Environment – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 24th January 1973.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Dr Edmund Marshall Dr Edmund Marshall , Goole 12:00 am, 24th January 1973

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is now able to say how he proposes to reorganise water and sewage authorities on 1st April 1974.

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I would refer the hon. Member to the Water Bill, which has been published today.

Photo of Dr Edmund Marshall Dr Edmund Marshall , Goole

In view of the proposed timetable for water reorganisation, will the right hon. and learned Gentleman consider amending the Bill published today to make statutory provision for machinery of consultation between existing water and sewerage authorities and the new ones?

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I do not think that any statutory provision will be necessary. One appreciates that over the whole range of local government reorganisation there is a tight timetable to which local authorities have to work. I do not envisage any difficulty about consultation under the present auspices.

Photo of Mr David Waddington Mr David Waddington , Nelson and Colne

Is this Bill really necessary, or is it one of those which have been extracted from a departmental pigeon-hole when there is not much else to put into the programme? [Interruption.] I am referring to the programme of the Department. Will my right hon. and learned Friend recognise that some of us are extremely sceptical about the claim that large authorities lead to greater efficiency? Time and time again we have seen the opposite occur.

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I regard the Bill as necessary. The general principles of it are widely accepted. There have been discussions about the composition of the regional water authorities and here we have gone a long way to meet the objections of local authorities by providing for an absolute majority of local authority members on each regional authority.

Photo of Mr Denis Howell Mr Denis Howell , Birmingham Small Heath

Although the Opposition have serious misgiving about much of the Bill, especially about the taking away of local authority services and about the failure to nationalise all water, may I ask whether the right hon. and learned Gentleman is aware that it would be wrong not to pay tribute to the Government for bending to public opinion about the maintenance of the canal system and keeping the British Waterways Authority in existence? To that extent we offer some welcome to the Government's proposals.

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman's general agreement with the principle of the Bill—

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I appreciate that when we come to the Committee stage, as always, a number of points will be raised by right hon. and hon. Members on both sides.

Photo of Mr Toby Jessel Mr Toby Jessel , Twickenham

Will my right hon. and learned Friend ensure that a major rôle is assigned to the Greater London Council to deal with water and sewage in greater London?

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

The GLC will have a major rôle to play. It will have a large representation on the regional water authority. It will also retain its land drainage powers.

Photo of Mr Geoffrey De Freitas Mr Geoffrey De Freitas , Kettering

The right hon. and learned Gentleman appears to have misunderstood my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Small Heath (Mr. Denis Howell). My hon. Friend was referring to the concessions which the Government had made to the pressure brought to bear by the British Waterways Authority.

Photo of Mr Geoffrey Rippon Mr Geoffrey Rippon , Hexham

I thought that the hon. Member for Small Heath sounded reasonably encouraging.