No, Sir. As I told the House on 21st January, the international status of the German Democratic Republic has for long been in dispute. The question of East German participation in the World Health Organisation is a political issue which, we believe, should not be dealt with in a technical body such as the World Health Organisation but in an appropriate political organ of the United Nations, such as the General Assembly.—[Vol. 829. c. 275.]
I agree that the intrusion of power politics into these specialised agencies is wrong. I had some experience of it myself in the past. I remember an occasion at a UNESCO meeting in Paris when I was involved in a difficult situation as a result of such intrusion. Others are seeking to make that intrusion into the WHO, and we think it wrong; we consider that matters of this kind should be settled in the political organs of the United Nations.
The right hon. Gentleman is showing no sense of urgency on this matter. Is he aware that although some of us agree that this particular problem and others similar can, perhaps, not be primarily solved by individual solutions along the lines suggested by my hon. Friend the Member for Halifax (Dr. Summerskill), we should wish to express our strong support for the Ostpolitik now being pursued so vigorously by the West German Administration? Will he agree that it might well be that within that context there is the best chance for the future of making eventual use of the undoubted talents of the GDR?
I understand what the hon. and learned Gentleman says about the Ostpolitik, and we have always supported that Ostpolitik. But it is for the Bundestag itself to make the decisions in this regard, and, just as we should resent being told by it what decisions we should come to, I feel that it is wrong for us to suggest what decision it should take. As I say, we have always supported the Ostpolitik, and, if the Bundestag should ratify, we should welcome it.