Oral Answers to Questions — Technology – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 23 February 1970.
Mr John Eden
, Bournemouth West
12:00,
23 February 1970
asked the Minister of Technology if he will give the total cost so far of the Gas Council's conversion programme to natural gas and the proportion this represents of the original estimate.
Mr Donald Williams
, Dudley
asked the Minister of Technology (1) whether the estimate submitted to him by the Gas Council of the cost of conversion of customers' appliances to burn natural gas has been revised in the light of the extensive follow-up campaign that has been necessary;
Mr Rafton Pounder
, Belfast South
asked the Minister of Technology what is the latest estimate of the total cost of the Gas Council's programme of conversion to natural gas; what proportion of this programme has been completed; and at what cost.
Mr Patrick McNair-Wilson
, New Forest
asked the Minister of Technology what is the Gas Council's estimated total investment in conversion to natural gas for each of the next five years expressed as a proportion of total capital expenditure.
Mr Harold Lever
, Manchester Cheetham
£31½ million to 31st March 1969, including £24½ million in 1968–69. This includes costs of setting up the programme and is 8 per cent of the original estimate made in 1966 of total expenditure of £400 million, which included provision for a call-back service. Since 1966 both costs and numbers expected to be converted have increased. I am currently discussing with the industry their capital development and conversion expenditure over the next five years, and am not in a position to give a revised estimate of the total cost.
Mr John Eden
, Bournemouth West
Have the figures in the estimate for the cost of call-back gone up since the original programme was conceived?
Mr Harold Lever
, Manchester Cheetham
Without notice of that question, I cannot give a very accurate reply.
Mr Patrick McNair-Wilson
, New Forest
None the less, can the right hon. Gentleman confirm that the cost of the programme is likely to be very much more than was originally planned? Is this the right moment for the Gas Council to be spending even more money diversifying further into the oil business at this stage?
Mr Harold Lever
, Manchester Cheetham
I find it difficult to understand what diversification into the oil business, since a relatively trifling sum is involved, has to do with the question. If the hon. Gentleman asserts with confindence that the programme will cost more than was originally intended—
Mr Patrick McNair-Wilson
, New Forest
I am asking.
Mr Harold Lever
, Manchester Cheetham
If the hon. Gentleman asks me that question, I can only tell him that I am not yet in a position to give the answer. However, there is no reason as yet to have the alarm or excitement which the hon. Gentleman generates.
Mr Robert Sheldon
, Ashton-under-Lyne
Is my right hon. Friend aware that, although the conversions done by the gas board have been reasonably satisfactory, what is causing a great deal of trouble is some of the sub-contracting? Perhaps it would be worth while expanding the size of the work force involved so that it will be up to gas board standards and not those of some of the sub-contractors.
Mr Harold Lever
, Manchester Cheetham
We are anxious to maintain the highest standard of sub-contracting work as well as to expand our own force dealing with this matter, precisely because of the total volume of work requiring attention. But my hon. Friend will recall that in the Gas Bill we make special provisions for encouraging the highest supervision of standards of work in the case of sub-contractors.
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order, Private notice Question. Mr. Corfield.
Mr Joel Barnett
, Heywood and Royton
On a point of order. Mr. Speaker. In view of the unsatisfactory nature of that reply, I beg to give notice that I shall raise the matter in the Adjournment Debate on Thursday.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
An adjournment debate is a short half hour debate that is introduced by a backbencher at the end of each day's business in the House of Commons.
Adjournment debates are also held in the side chamber of Westminster Hall.
This technical procedure of debating a motion that the House should adjourn gives backbench members the opportunity to discuss issues of concern to them, and to have a minister respond to the points they raise.
The speaker holds a weekly ballot in order to decide which backbench members will get to choose the subject for each daily debate.
Backbenchers normally use this as an opportunity to debate issues related to their constituency.
An all-day adjournment debate is normally held on the final day before each parliamentary recess begins. On these occasions MPs do not have to give advance notice of the subjects which they intend to raise.
The leader of the House replies at the end of the debate to all of the issues raised.
The Speaker is an MP who has been elected to act as Chairman during debates in the House of Commons. He or she is responsible for ensuring that the rules laid down by the House for the carrying out of its business are observed. It is the Speaker who calls MPs to speak, and maintains order in the House. He or she acts as the House's representative in its relations with outside bodies and the other elements of Parliament such as the Lords and the Monarch. The Speaker is also responsible for protecting the interests of minorities in the House. He or she must ensure that the holders of an opinion, however unpopular, are allowed to put across their view without undue obstruction. It is also the Speaker who reprimands, on behalf of the House, an MP brought to the Bar of the House. In the case of disobedience the Speaker can 'name' an MP which results in their suspension from the House for a period. The Speaker must be impartial in all matters. He or she is elected by MPs in the House of Commons but then ceases to be involved in party politics. All sides in the House rely on the Speaker's disinterest. Even after retirement a former Speaker will not take part in political issues. Taking on the office means losing close contact with old colleagues and keeping apart from all groups and interests, even avoiding using the House of Commons dining rooms or bars. The Speaker continues as a Member of Parliament dealing with constituent's letters and problems. By tradition other candidates from the major parties do not contest the Speaker's seat at a General Election. The Speakership dates back to 1377 when Sir Thomas Hungerford was appointed to the role. The title Speaker comes from the fact that the Speaker was the official spokesman of the House of Commons to the Monarch. In the early years of the office, several Speakers suffered violent deaths when they presented unwelcome news to the King. Further information can be obtained from factsheet M2 on the UK Parliament website.
