– in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 28 January 1970.
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
12:00,
28 January 1970
Sir Harmar Nicholls
, Peterborough
On a point of order. How can a question be asked, Mr. Speaker, when a point of order has been raised by the hon. Member who wanted to apologise?
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. The Chair is aware at all times that after Question Time is over hon. Members are so enthusiastic that they want to put questions. I noticed that the hon. Member wanted to put a question, but it was half a minute past half-past three.
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
With permission, Mr. Speaker, I should like to make a short Business statement.
The business tomorrow has been rearranged as follows:
Until seven o'clock, Supply [8th Allotted day] (First Part), when there will be a debate on an Opposition Motion relating to Housing.
Afterwards, as already announced, the Chairman of Ways and Means has named opposed Private Business for consideration.
Mr Arthur Lewis
, West Ham North
Mr Hugh Jenkins
, Wandsworth Putney
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. Only one hon. Member may address the House at one time.
Mr Arthur Lewis
, West Ham North
Can the Leader of the House say whether he feels, since on a Thursday the Orders of the Day are usually not reached until ten minutes past four, there will be adequate time for the debate on housing, considering that both Front Benches will take part in it? Will there be adequate time for back benchers? After all, this matter does affect hon. Members with Constituency interests. About an hour will be split between the two Front Benches. Does my right hon. Friend consider that this will be a fair and reasonable debate? Could we not have a whole day for it?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
Lieut-Colonel Sir Walter Bromley-Davenport
, Knutsford
Further to that point of order—
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. The hon. Member for Knutsford (Sir W. Bromley-Davenport) must behave himself.
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
In reply to my hon. Friend the Member for West Ham, North (Mr. Arthur Lewis), I agree with him that it is important that back benchers should have opportunities in the debate, but it is not for me to decide this. I would hope that the front bench speeches will be short and precise.
Lieut-Colonel Sir Walter Bromley-Davenport
, Knutsford
On a point of explanation, Mr. Speaker—
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. Point of explanation is an animal I do not recognise.
Lieut-Colonel Sir Walter Bromley-Davenport
, Knutsford
Further to that point of order. I am extremely sorry, Mr. Speaker, if I did something, or if I am doing something, not in order, but I am deaf. I am extremely sorry.
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. The House always accepts apologies in the spirit in which they are offered, and I do, wholeheartedly.
Mr Hugh Jenkins
, Wandsworth Putney
Can my right hon. Friend say when the Films Bill, displaced by the change of business tomorrow, will be debated? Will it be in the early part of next week?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
I will make an announcement tomorrow about this.
Sir Harmar Nicholls
, Peterborough
In supporting the point made by the hon. Member for West Ham, North (Mr. Arthur Lewis) about the lack of time for the housing debate tomorrow, may I ask, why could not the Government have found time for this most important subject? Why did they wait for the Opposition to have this vital subject debated in the House? Cannot even now another half a day, making a full day, be found out of Government time for this matter to be examined in detail?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
The hon. Member has been in the House a long time and he knows that the Opposition, quite rightly, takes the initiative on these Supply Days. We have this half day's debate. Let us proceed with it in the normal way.
Sir Arthur Harvey
, Macclesfield
In view of the short time for this very important debate tomorrow will the right hon. Gentleman give an assurance that the Prime Minister, on his return, will not give us a longwinded statement about his visit to America?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
That is another matter.
Mr Gordon Bagier
, Sunderland South
Will my right hon. Friend take serious note of the point made by the hon. Member for Peterborough (Sir Harmar Nicholls)? Could we not have a full day to debate the question of housing? Many of us would like to examine in depth many of the reasons why the Tory-controlled councils have cut back on their housing. This lack of time limits the possibility of debating that. We also should like to examine in some depth whether this cutback by Conservative councils is a policy coordinated between the Tory councils and the Conservative Central Office, but opportunity to examine that tomorrow will be denied us because of the shortness of the debate.
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
I have announced the business. Quite rightly, under Standing Order No. 18 the Opposition have the initiative in the matter for debate and we are to have this half day's debate.
Mr Reginald Maudling
, Barnet
I think that the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Macclesfield (Sir A. V. Harvey) is very important. Without wanting to particularise, may I ask whether the right hon. Gentleman, as Leader of the House, will ensure that the business is so arranged that there is the maximum time available for the debate of housing?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
I hope so, but, obviously, if the House wishes the Prime Minister to make a statement he will do so. But I will do all I can. I cannot go further than that.
Mr Michael Jopling
, Westmorland
Can the right hon. Gentleman say just at what time we can expect a vote on the Private Bill which is to be debated tomorrow?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
The normal time, 10 o'clock.
Dr Horace King
, Southampton, Itchen
Order. We are concerned with a statement only about a half-day's business.
Mr Fred Blackburn
, Stalybridge and Hyde
Is my right hon. Friend aware that more time will be available for debate tomorrow if less time than usual is wasted on Business questions?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
That is another matter. I appreciate that hon. Members wish to raise questions and legitimate points on business, but I wish they would not be so verbose.
Mr Tim Fortescue
, Liverpool, Garston
Can the Leader of the House say whether the Prayer which was originally set down for after the Private Bill tomorrow will be debated tomorrow?
Mr Thomas Peart
, Workington
Yes, Sir. It will come as soon as the Private Business is disposed of.
The House of Commons is one of the houses of parliament. Here, elected MPs (elected by the "commons", i.e. the people) debate. In modern times, nearly all power resides in this house. In the commons are 650 MPs, as well as a speaker and three deputy speakers.
The Speaker is an MP who has been elected to act as Chairman during debates in the House of Commons. He or she is responsible for ensuring that the rules laid down by the House for the carrying out of its business are observed. It is the Speaker who calls MPs to speak, and maintains order in the House. He or she acts as the House's representative in its relations with outside bodies and the other elements of Parliament such as the Lords and the Monarch. The Speaker is also responsible for protecting the interests of minorities in the House. He or she must ensure that the holders of an opinion, however unpopular, are allowed to put across their view without undue obstruction. It is also the Speaker who reprimands, on behalf of the House, an MP brought to the Bar of the House. In the case of disobedience the Speaker can 'name' an MP which results in their suspension from the House for a period. The Speaker must be impartial in all matters. He or she is elected by MPs in the House of Commons but then ceases to be involved in party politics. All sides in the House rely on the Speaker's disinterest. Even after retirement a former Speaker will not take part in political issues. Taking on the office means losing close contact with old colleagues and keeping apart from all groups and interests, even avoiding using the House of Commons dining rooms or bars. The Speaker continues as a Member of Parliament dealing with constituent's letters and problems. By tradition other candidates from the major parties do not contest the Speaker's seat at a General Election. The Speakership dates back to 1377 when Sir Thomas Hungerford was appointed to the role. The title Speaker comes from the fact that the Speaker was the official spokesman of the House of Commons to the Monarch. In the early years of the office, several Speakers suffered violent deaths when they presented unwelcome news to the King. Further information can be obtained from factsheet M2 on the UK Parliament website.
The Opposition are the political parties in the House of Commons other than the largest or Government party. They are called the Opposition because they sit on the benches opposite the Government in the House of Commons Chamber. The largest of the Opposition parties is known as Her Majesty's Opposition. The role of the Official Opposition is to question and scrutinise the work of Government. The Opposition often votes against the Government. In a sense the Official Opposition is the "Government in waiting".
In a general election, each Constituency chooses an MP to represent them. MPs have a responsibility to represnt the views of the Constituency in the House of Commons. There are 650 Constituencies, and thus 650 MPs. A citizen of a Constituency is known as a Constituent
The first bench on either side of the House of Commons, reserved for ministers and leaders of the principal political parties.
The political party system in the English-speaking world evolved in the 17th century, during the fight over the ascension of James the Second to the Throne. James was a Catholic and a Stuart. Those who argued for Parliamentary supremacy were called Whigs, after a Scottish word whiggamore, meaning "horse-driver," applied to Protestant rebels. It was meant as an insult.
They were opposed by Tories, from the Irish word toraidhe (literally, "pursuer," but commonly applied to highwaymen and cow thieves). It was used — obviously derisively — to refer to those who supported the Crown.
By the mid 1700s, the words Tory and Whig were commonly used to describe two political groupings. Tories supported the Church of England, the Crown, and the country gentry, while Whigs supported the rights of religious dissent and the rising industrial bourgeoisie. In the 19th century, Whigs became Liberals; Tories became Conservatives.
