Would I be right, therefore, in assuming that the answer to the question is "No", and will the Prime Minister bear in mind that this contradicts what he and his right hon. and hon. Friends have been saying for years, implying that they would at all times accept resolutions of the United Nations? The understanding that he will not do this will give great satisfaction to many people.
We have never said that we would accept every recommendation, for example, of the General Assembly in relation to Rhodesia. There are some resolutions passed by the General Assembly, for instance, that calling for immediate majority rule in Rhodesia, which we have always rejected. There has never been any question that we would have to act in that way. Our policy on the question of majority rule is well known.
The rôle of the United Nations in the matter of Rhodesia which we have often debated in the House, is to faciltate and to make more universal the sanctions on which this House has decided. Responsibility for Rhodesia is that of the British Government and will remain so, but we went to the United Nations to ensure that the sanctions which we are applying, by decision of the House, should be applied by other countries. That, I believe, is the role of the United Nations, not the operation of principles like Nibmar.