Orders of the Day — HIRE-PURCHASE (No. 2) BILL [Lords] – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 24 June 1964.
Sir David Price
, Eastleigh
I beg to move, in page 13, line 3, at the end to insert:
(2) The following subsection shall be substituted for section 8(2) of the principal Act (whereby a condition is implied where the hirer makes known the particular purpose for which the goods are required):—
(2) Where the hirer, whether expressly or by implication,—
there shall be an implied condition that the goods shall be reasonably fit for that purpose.Section 24(2) of the Hire-Purchase Act 1964 shall apply for the purposes of this subsection as it applies for the purposes of Part I of that Act.
During the Committee stage, the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hillsborough (Mr. Darling) raised a point about Section 8(2) of the 1938 Act, which provides that where the hirer makes known the particular purpose for which the goods are required there shall be an implied condition that the goods are reasonably fit for that purpose.
The case which the hon. Member for Hillsborough raised presumed that the dealer was, in fact, the agent of the finance house for the purpose of receiving a communication of the purpose for which the goods were required. Subsequently I wrote to him saying that I was satisfied that any subsequent change in relationship between the dealer and the finance house would not affect the position; the finance house would remain bound by the implied condition.
However, I have since re-examined Section 8(2) and think that it can be improved. Usually the dealer is not the agent of the finance house for receiving a communication of the purpose for which the goods are required. A hirer who has made a purpose known to the dealer will, therefore, not normally have the benefit of the implied condition. To do so, he would have to make that purpose specifically known to the finance house.
The Amendment provides that the condition of fitness for a particular purpose is implied if the hirer makes that purpose known either to the owner or a person who conducted any antecedent negotiation. This person is normally the dealer. In effect, the Amendment makes the dealer the agent of the finance house for receiving a communication of that purpose.
It is interesting to observe that since the Molony Report was issued the Law Reform Committee has recommended that the dealer shall be the agent of the owner in respect of representations about the goods, and this is being implemented in Clause 10. It is an obvious extension of this principle to make the dealer the agent of the owner for the receipt of a communication about the specific purpose for which the goods are required.
Mr George Darling
, Sheffield, Hillsborough
All that I want to say is, "Thank you".
A parliamentary bill is divided into sections called clauses.
Printed in the margin next to each clause is a brief explanatory `side-note' giving details of what the effect of the clause will be.
During the committee stage of a bill, MPs examine these clauses in detail and may introduce new clauses of their own or table amendments to the existing clauses.
When a bill becomes an Act of Parliament, clauses become known as sections.
As a bill passes through Parliament, MPs and peers may suggest amendments - or changes - which they believe will improve the quality of the legislation.
Many hundreds of amendments are proposed by members to major bills as they pass through committee stage, report stage and third reading in both Houses of Parliament.
In the end only a handful of amendments will be incorporated into any bill.
The Speaker - or the chairman in the case of standing committees - has the power to select which amendments should be debated.
