Oral Answers to Questions — Scotland – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 24 June 1964.
Mr Jo Grimond
, Orkney and Shetland
12:00,
24 June 1964
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will now take steps to set up a Highland Development Authority.
Mr James Stodart
, Edinburgh West
No, Sir. My right hon. Friend takes the view that the setting up of a Highland Development Authority is a matter for consideration in the light of the outcome of the Scottish Development Group's current review of the Highlands and Islands.
Mr Jo Grimond
, Orkney and Shetland
Is the hon. Gentleman aware that his right hon. Friend is wrong, that this matter has been under consideration for years and years, and that the north of Scotland cries out now for some executive action by a body which is not merely advisory but which has a duty to act and some finance? Will the hon. Gentleman read the introduction by Crowther to the Buchanan Report which makes quite clear that development authorities are the solution to the imbalance which exists between different parts of the country?
Mr James Stodart
, Edinburgh West
It is true that a great deal of the activity in the Highlands does need co-ordination, but where coordination is required it can be achieved through the action of the Secretary of State and his Departments, with the advice of bodies like the Highlands Panel or the recently established Highland Transport Board.
Sir John Macleod
, Ross and Cromarty
Has my hon. Friend been given any indication by the right hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr. Grimond) and others of the powers that they would be prepared to take out of the hands of the local authorities and give to a body like the one suggested? That is a very important factor.
Mr James Stodart
, Edinburgh West
It is one of the considerable problems involved.
Mr William Ross
, Kilmarnock
The Government say that co-ordinating action should be achieved by the Secretary of State, but is it not the case, certainly in transport, that such action has not been forthcoming and that there is conflicting advice from various advisory bodies in relation to what is being done by the Minister of Transport and the Secretary of State? Is it not also true that the Government always manage to find a reason for saying "No" to taking the right action in the Highlands? Is it not time that we had a body with executive authority and suitably backed with adequate finance?
Mr James Stodart
, Edinburgh West
The Highland Transport Board has a promising future and I expect great things of it.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
