Oral Answers to Questions — Multilateral Nuclear Force

– in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 9 June 1964.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Mr Fred Mulley Mr Fred Mulley , Sheffield Park 12:00, 9 June 1964

asked the Prime Minister what arrangements he has made to co-ordinate the views of the Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence in putting forward alternative proposals for a multilateral nuclear force within the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Study Group.

Photo of Sir Alec Douglas-Home Sir Alec Douglas-Home , Kinross and West Perthshire

There is already effective co-ordination between the two Departments, and no special arrangements were necessary in this case.

Photo of Mr Fred Mulley Mr Fred Mulley , Sheffield Park

May we assume from the Prime Minister's Answer that the respective views of the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Defence are now reconciled about the multilateral force, and can he say which one prevailed? Secondly, will he confirm that there has been no commitment by Her Majesty's Government to participate in the proposed force? Is not there a danger that by putting forward proposals they will be construed by our allies as an acceptance, in principle, of that force, and a commitment to participate in it should it be set up?

Photo of Sir Alec Douglas-Home Sir Alec Douglas-Home , Kinross and West Perthshire

No, Sir. There is no commitment, and I do not think that by putting forward possible alternative methods we accept the principle, although I have always said that there is a lot to be said, on the political argument, in favour of this force. But, if there is to be such a force, we want to get the best military set-up. That is the wish of the Foreign Office and the Secretary of State for Defence.

Photo of Mr Patrick Gordon Walker Mr Patrick Gordon Walker , Smethwick

Does that reply mean that the Government have not yet made up their mind whether they are for or against a multilateral force?

Photo of Sir Alec Douglas-Home Sir Alec Douglas-Home , Kinross and West Perthshire

Nobody has made up his mind, in this Government or any other Government, because this is a matter which is being studied in Paris and Washington.

Prime Minister

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_the_United_Kingdom

Secretary of State

Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.