National Assistance Board (Disregards)

Oral Answers to Questions — Pensions and National Insurance – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 26 January 1959.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Sir Raymond Gower Sir Raymond Gower , Barry 12:00, 26 January 1959

asked the Minister of Pensions and National Insurance if he will introduce legislation to amend the provisions of the Second Schedule to the National Assistance Act, 1948, in order to increase the sums disregarded by the National Assistance Board in view of changed conditions and the changed value of money.

Photo of Mr John Boyd-Carpenter Mr John Boyd-Carpenter , Kingston upon Thames

I have no proposals for legislation on this subject.

Photo of Sir Raymond Gower Sir Raymond Gower , Barry

Will my right hon. Friend take account of the fact that since these disregards were fixed successive Governments have deemed it appropriate to increase the amount of the basic pension on several occasions? Does he not therefore think it reasonable that these disregards should be reviewed and changed?

Photo of Mr John Boyd-Carpenter Mr John Boyd-Carpenter , Kingston upon Thames

As my hon. Friend has very fairly said, it has been the policy of successive Governments to put what money was available into improvements in the rates of assistance, with the result that all benefited, whether they had income to disregard or not.

Photo of Mr James Griffiths Mr James Griffiths , Llanelli

The right hon. Gentleman was not here a moment or two earlier when some hon. Members opposite pressed him and his colleagues to bring the horticultural tariff up to a realistic figure, taking account of the increase in the cost of living. I presume that the Government will pay some attention to what their hon. Friends ask them to do at this stage. Does not the Minister realise that it has become a disincentive to saving that we have not made any changes in the amounts of these disregards since 1948?

Photo of Mr John Boyd-Carpenter Mr John Boyd-Carpenter , Kingston upon Thames

The right hon. Gentleman is as familiar as anybody else in the House with the reasons why successive Governments have taken that line. As for the opening remarks of his supplementary question, I do not think it is any part of my duty today to answer supplementaries relating to the previous round of Questions.