Oral Answers to Questions — Corporal Punishment (Home Secretary's Speech)

– in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 2 December 1958.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lieut-Colonel Sir Thomas Moore Lieut-Colonel Sir Thomas Moore , Ayr 12:00, 2 December 1958

asked the Prime Minister whether the statement, spare the rod and spoil the child, by the Secretary of State for the Home Department at a recent meeting in Chelsea, represents the policy of Her Majesty's Government.

Photo of Mr Harold Macmillan Mr Harold Macmillan , Bromley

My right hon. Friend was referring to the use of corporal punishment by parents or teachers, as enjoined by the Book of Proverbs.

Photo of Lieut-Colonel Sir Thomas Moore Lieut-Colonel Sir Thomas Moore , Ayr

If that is so, and, of course, I accept the Prime Minister's statement, will he please say why the Government persist in preventing that same rod being used by the law in appropriate circumstances and at appropriate times?

Photo of Mr Harold Macmillan Mr Harold Macmillan , Bromley

I said that my right hon. Friend was referring to parents and teachers. He might, of course, have harked back to an earlier Butler, who wrote: Love is a boy, by poets styled;Then spare the rod, and spoil the child.

Photo of Mr Michael Maitland Stewart Mr Michael Maitland Stewart , Fulham

Since the Prime Minister referred to the advice given in the Book of Proverbs by King Solomon, could he tell us why, if King Solomon knew so much about how to bring up children, his own son was such a thoroughly bad character?

Photo of Mr Harold Macmillan Mr Harold Macmillan , Bromley

I think the hon. Gentleman has taken a rather narrow view. He has selected one child from what, I understand, was a much wider company.