Is the Lord Privy Seal telling us that he is not aware that according to the Press it has been decided to establish nuclear weapon bases in this country, four of them in Scotland? if that is the case, can he say whether the control and custody of the warheads of those missiles have to remain in the hands of the United States Government? Does he not regard that as an affront to this country? Are we now to become a Maginot Line for the defence of the United States of America, even assuming that defence is possible?
No, Sir; I do not accept all the points made in the hon. Member's supplementary question. It is valuable to work with the United States of America on the principle of pooling resources and that is precisely what we are doing.
asked the Prime Minister, in view of his declaration on 16th December of willingness to enter into high level discussions with the Soviet Government, whether he will now prohibit the stationing of United States ballistic missiles in this country, put an end to the carrying of nuclear weapons by British-based aeroplanes on patrol, and accept the Polish and Soviet offer of an agreement to keep Germany and Eastern Europe free of nuclear weapons pending the outcome of these talks.
I have been asked to reply.
When my right hon. Friend said that he would go to any length in discussion, debate or argument which would prove our sincerity, he said also that he would make no concession to our safety. The Answer to the Question is, therefore, "No, Sir."
I apologise for being slow, Mr. Speaker, but I was so thunderstruck by that Answer that I could not rise quickly.
Does the Lord Privy Seal mean to say that the Government will enter negotiations with a determination to make no change in their position and to make no concessions whatsoever but to remain on a strictly war footing?