Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Clause 3. — (Short Title.)

Orders of the Day — Post Office and Telegraph (Money) Bill – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 26th June 1952.

Alert me about debates like this

Question again proposed, "That the Clause stand part of the Bill."

8.6 p.m.

Photo of Mr Charles Hobson Mr Charles Hobson , Keighley

I know that it is unusual to speak on the Short Title of a Bill, and that it is very difficult to do so when the Bill has not been amended by the Committee in its scope. What I am concerned about is that this Clause is not exactly accurate in its description. It states: This Act may be cited as the Post Office and Telegraph (Money) Act, 1952. That title has been common to all Post Office (Money) Bills that have been before this House. The reason for my suggesting that it is not accurate is that this Bill relates, so far as capital expenditure is concerned, not to telegraphs but to telephones. I am quite aware that in previous legislation telephones were telegraphs, but I am now suggesting that since the Telephone Bill, 1951, telephones are now telephones.

The Deputy-Chairman:

I do not see an Amendment down to this Clause.

Photo of Mr Charles Hobson Mr Charles Hobson , Keighley

There is no Amendment down, but I was hoping that perhaps the next time we have a Post Office Bill the word "telephone" could be included, and that was the object of my remarks.

Question put, and agreed to.